They had nothing to do with terrorists. even the feds admit that.
2006-10-11 04:15:37 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
"sheeple" dang, that's GOOD. Did you do that on purpose? Is it original? If so, you're great.
Most folks believe what they're told till it's proved otherwise. Some never listen to the proof!
2006-10-11 04:33:26 · answer #1 · answered by Baby'sMom 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's the old Hitler "Big Lie" technique: Repeat something often enough and people will believe it.
Frank Luntz, the Republican Party's Joey Goebbels, sent instructions to the party: Do not mention Iraq without also mentioning 9/11 and the War on Terror. The Bush Administration never clearly stated that Iraq was behind 9/11, but they hinted it so consistently that at one time 60% of Americans believed it. Then when it turned out that Iraq had nothing to do with it, they could honestly claim, "Well we never SAID that Iraq was behind it!" They didn't have to.
2006-10-11 14:32:42 · answer #2 · answered by kreevich 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because I that was what Bush said. After Sep. 11 he invaded Afghanistan because that is where the terrorists are. Then he said the terrorists had support from Iraq, so he invaded Iraq. It might be for the oil as well.
2006-10-11 11:28:12 · answer #3 · answered by pip 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Notice that we have had a real concern with N. Korea, and it's getting worse now. They aren't stupid enough to F with them, though. They know we'd get done up and it would be nasty. The US likes to pick on the little guy. The terrorism thing is real to a degree, but most of it, we brought upon ourselves by being in these people's countries and housing their resources. Payback is a Biatch. I suggest that all US citizens have a back-up plan to get the hell out of here if Jong Il declares war.
2006-10-11 11:23:03 · answer #4 · answered by Goddess of Nuts PBUH 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sheeple is a perfect description. Because they blindly follow the liar Bush and his cronies. Just like sheep.
I thought we attacked because of WMDs? Oh, wait that was a lie too.
2006-10-11 11:20:24 · answer #5 · answered by Fire_God_69 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even bush has admitted it then in his next sentance he says were fighting the terrorists over there so we don't have to fight them here if the repubs leaders is confused of course his sheep like followers are going to be.
2006-10-11 11:20:16 · answer #6 · answered by region50 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i like the word sheeple,, no one in any sanity can get behind what the USA is doin over there, even here( i live in indiana),, what in hell is this? the next 2 yrs are gonna be to be paid for,, in 2 fold too what we've already paid and done and hope we dont get fooled again, even my simple a$$ can see this is wrong,, wish, pray, VOTE, lets change this untill next time
2006-10-11 11:34:31 · answer #7 · answered by phllipe b 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
True, but even Bush has tried to link it to terrorism. Especially after his approval rating went down
2006-10-11 11:21:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its,just another silly excuse,just like WMD,operation freedom,just to name a few.and by using that they brain wash people who only have one access it may seem to info,or who are loyal supporters of that administration.so indeed they are like(sheeple) sheeple's.
2006-10-11 11:27:50 · answer #9 · answered by joe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have to hand it to you for trying to get the sheep to understand. They are not known as the dumbest animal for nothing you know.
2006-10-11 11:35:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋