English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've seen pictures of her, and she dressed and made herself up like a high priced hooker. Hookers sometimes meet with bad ends. Shouldn't this serve as a morality tale for us all?

2006-10-11 03:27:31 · 13 answers · asked by cdrfish100 1 in News & Events Current Events

13 answers

You are an idiot. She was a little girl. She didnt buy her clothes nor choose anything about her lifestyle. Her parents did that.

All little girls want to feel like pretty princesses.....that they are loved and want to try on mommys makeup and BE like mommy. They also want parental approval...so if momy was pleased she did well in pagents...that made her happier than having her disappointed in her.

No child asks for abuse or sexual attention...they dont have the ability to understand what that means. Its up to the adults to shape a child so they know good attention from bad. Also there is a difference in modelling, acting and being real...if adults cant figure that out THEY have some mental disorder...NOT the child.

2006-10-11 03:37:45 · answer #1 · answered by Scully 4 · 0 0

I DON'T think Jon Benet was "asking for it"--she was just a little six year old girl.

But, I do agree that we need to get a hold of our morals...

Mothers everywhere need to wake up and realize that there are sexual predators all around us. By allowing their daughters to dress in slinky clothes, they are tempting these men. I think that too much emphasis is placed on being sexy at a young age which leads to promiscuity, rape, etc....

2006-10-11 03:51:04 · answer #2 · answered by Godsgirl 2 · 0 0

I have to say, that's a really sick way of looking at things. For JonBenet to have been asking for "it" she'd have to know what "it" was and at the age of 6 I seriously doubt she would. Secondly, SHE didn't dress or make herself up to look like a high priced hooker. Her mother did that.

In any event, just like a grown woman, it doesn't matter what she was wearing. No one had a right to assault her.

2006-10-11 03:37:03 · answer #3 · answered by Q&A Queen 7 · 0 0

She became a six 365 days previous newborn you ignoramus. Her mothers and dads dressed her up like a "$3000 hooker" for newborn attractiveness pageants. incorrect? i think of so, yet "soliciting for it?" Please. God's judgment? you will be embarrassed approximately your self. The media HAS mentioned that fogeys who placed their toddlers in all those pageants could desire to be cognizant of sexual predators and that they are perfect. This nevertheless would not placed a newborn interior the class of "soliciting for it." A sexual predator is a disgusting criminal, era, and there is not any quarter given because of the fact of ways the sufferer became dressed, etc. You needless to say join the idiocy of thinking rape and homicide could nicely be condoned because of the fact the sufferer became "soliciting for it." it incredibly is between the main ignorant words ever created whilst utilized to crimes like rape and homicide. If a woman walked down the line butt *** bare, no person has the stunning to attack her for ANY reason. The criminal may be one hundred% at fault. undesirable style would not justify somebody of undesirable character (to assert the least) attacking them. adult men who use this as an excuse are the backside form of human beings. besides, all and sundry who thinks it does justify all those acts is heavily lacking in ethical character. i do no longer understand you (thank God), even nonetheless it form of feels you are the kind that would use a date rape drug or rape a woman who's handed out at a social gathering and thinks he can justify it. i'm hoping somebody's protecting an eye fixed on you, all and sundry who can ask a query like this seems a step far off from being a sexual predator themselves.

2016-12-13 06:16:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You can blame her mother for dressing her up like a hooker and parading her around at beauty pageants.

2006-10-11 03:34:48 · answer #5 · answered by Lee 7 · 0 0

If anyone was "asking for it", it would be her parents for dressing her that way. She didn't go to the store by herself and pick out her own clothes and make-up.

2006-10-11 03:40:02 · answer #6 · answered by Niecy 6 · 0 0

Such use of children in this country should be banned and outlawed and any parent exploiting a child in such a manner procsecuted! It was not the child's fault but the so called parents.

2006-10-11 08:27:39 · answer #7 · answered by CM 2 · 0 0

You are some kind of pedophile aren't you everybody should take a look at this guys other questions hes definitely a pedophile.

2006-10-11 04:02:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No! Nobody deserves to be raped and killed. She was only six! Here parents are the ones who put her in those clothes. You should be ashamed of yourself.

2006-10-11 03:57:56 · answer #9 · answered by Allison W 2 · 0 0

She was a child. Her parents exploited her shamelessly. The pictures are awful.
Her parents were at fault.

2006-10-11 03:37:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers