Why hasn't Bush invaded N.Korea with proof of WMD's?

Question

He was quick to invade Iraq with no proof of WMD's and what was eventually found was over 20 years old.

I'm not sure what 13 years you are talking about Bucko. The UN said they did not find WMD's In Iraq over those years. Nor did our troops find any..Bucko!! As far as N.Korea there has always been tension...Bucko!! Now on the news they say S.Korea is preparing for a nuclear war...Bucko. I sure hope your man can negotiate himself out of this one instead of playing cowboy!!

Answer 1

Because the UN hasn't drawn 50 gazillion lines in the sand and kept backing down while N Korea continued becoming more brazen--that's the main difference I see. Oh, and N Korea hasn't fired on US or British pilots in the no-fly zones, or put out a hit on a sitting head of state.

Answer 2

WMD were found in Iraq. Just not the level that we were expecting. There is alot more going on with Iraq that you obviously know. It was not just about oil. If we invaded North Korea we would have more of a problem than just them. China for one would not like it. The UN is all over this one too. If you knew a little history about South Eastern Asian politics then you would not ask. Try watching CNN or CNBC one night. Also we do not have the troop strength to support another front.

Answer 3

what the above person meant by 13 years, is that is how many years the UN was being messed with by saddam. he was playing games with weapons inspectors for that long.

We did have proof of wmd. If we would have gone in without warning, we would have gotten them before he moved them somewhere like syria.

Don't be so naive. If a cop came in your house with a warrant to search for a gun, could you say, "ok, search everywhere but that drawer" Then expect him to come back next week and say, "ok, search everywhere but that closet". Thats what the UN allowed saddam to do for 13 years.

So before you make comments, do some research!

Answer 4

properly dude there have been wmds in Iraq. Do a seek of usual Sada and are available across what he stated approximately shifting the wmds to Syria.He replaced into as quickly as the daily tutor and informed how he was to blame for the moving of them, whilst he moved them and Jon Stewart mentioned i don't care to experience you. there have been finished protection tension bases lacking formerly than we began conflict. seek for Oct. 24 2004 whilst John Kerry and John Edwards have been ranting a pair of military base lacking all there weapons. such using fact the firing pin for an atomic bomb ( they each and every made jester of their thumbs on the triggers whilst speaking approximately it) that's the toughest component to a nuclear bomb to have. There are one hundred,000"s ineffective Iraq's that have been poisoned. You had the administrative inspector of the UN inspection group stop using actuality that of how us of a of america might not help locate them

Answer 5

There is no oil in North Korea. Invading them would have been the smart thing to do in order to prevent some madman to gain access to a nuclear device. But there was that problem that Chump had to promise his corporate backers to invade Iraq to get their fingers on the Iraqi oil; ergo we couldn't fight the war that was necessary, but had to fight the war that was profitable (at least for big oil, the war industry and Halliburton).

In North Korea they would have had only a humanitarian crisis on their hands. In Iraq they have a LOT of oil on their hands.

Answer 6

Now we don't have troops left. There will be no Invasion on this one, that's impossible. Did Iraq even have an army?
NKorea has a MILLION man army! There is NO fighting them. Remember Vietnam? It would be that times a hundred. That is why if we did fight them, it would be nuclear war,
Or we must pressure China to invade them and liberate their people.
The people of NKorea have been suffering too long.

Answer 7

1) not much oil in the region
2) north korea and its neighbors has WMDs unlike the regions in the middle east.
3) not enough troops to fight in another "invasion"

Answer 8

We are totally bogged down in a hopeless war based on a lie in Iraq. We don't have enough troops there so now when a real threat comes along, we have no way to fight it. China and Japan will have to settle this one. They are closest to the danger anyway.

Answer 9

they pose no threat to the USA. first a navel blockade and if they don't like that then we will whip their little @sses. do you really think that the us army is stretch thin ? the fighters in Iraq are reservist the full army hasn't been deployed. when the arm force regulars go into action you will see another story. who ever says we are stretched thin knows nothing about the might of the us armed forces. don't forget all males sign up for selective service when they are 18. if need be they will draft all those that are registered to fight.

Answer 10

Hehehe...
Now he stretched us very thin, wasting troops in Iraq in a war that has proved NO RELATION to the war on terror, or even found the damn weapons of mass destruction