Korea screwed the US last time with his one on one talks. He got 2 new reactors out of the deal and made fools of the Clinton Negotiating team. We are not going down that road again. The 6 party talks include all the stake holders, the retard in N. Korea needs to deal with them.
2006-10-11 02:39:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
It is in fairness to the countries most involved...each one has a stake in the talks, but it is rational to begin with one on one...and as we do in China, gain small things to turn things to our advantage. Remember that face (dignity) is very important in Asia, and North Korea wants to be treated such. If North Korea can talk directly to the US, then the US has given them face. But by insisting on the 6 part negotiation, they feel overwhelmed. Unfortunately people in Washington do not understand the Asian mind, and they act or react without consideration to the culture or customs. We must be prepared to open negotiations with the intent to include China and South Korea...but in my estimation Japan should be excluded. Remember that North Korea has mutual defense treaties with China and Russia and any attack on North Korea would draw them into the fight and it would escalate into World War III. The dignity of a man is precious and so is the dignity of a country, so we need to begin to reason together.
2006-10-11 02:50:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Frank 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
So that when the North Koreans lie or break what they agreed to there is not this he said she said. Secondly there was 1 on 1 talks with North Korea they stopped when it was found out that North Korea was conterfiting U.S. money and trading the stuff that we gave them from the 1994 talks and trade agreement by Clinton to other nations, like Iran and Syria.
2006-10-11 03:52:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by fatboysdaddy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it extremely is basically between the threats that have become dangerously boring information products. i think of there could properly be a disagreement in the close to destiny if China does not step in to stop it. North Korea would be destroyed yet i do no longer think of they care approximately this too plenty as they're a war device bent on suitable disagreement.
2016-12-08 12:46:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, you see, that's what Clinton did. He had 1-on-1 talks with N. Korea to end N.Korea's nuclear projects. When N.Korea cheated on the deal, they blamed the U.S., and tried to hold us responsible. We don't want to be in that position again, so if we use 6 party talks, they can't blame just one country.
2006-10-11 02:47:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by boyfriend_love_jessica 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
N Korea is wanting talks with the USA because USA is actively targetting it with it speeches of "Axis of Evil" and has previously wanted to nuke N Korea. No other country is doing that.
If I was the leader of N Korea I'd desperately would want to speak with America too, alone, seeing as no other countries have the want or the capability to nuke me.
2006-10-11 02:40:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by dane 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
North Korea is getting exactly what it wants, attention and news headlines, they should be ignored but let them play there games then act, they may just make a mistake and blow themselves up, which would cause world damage, but i think they are just playing cards and right now their winning. UN should be involved, we cant handle them one on one, we are like a tired fighter on the ropes and they know it!
2006-10-11 02:43:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by edgarrrw 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Only God, Bush and the belligerent little dwarf in N Korea knows the answer to that. The rest of us are scratching our heads in confusion.
2006-10-11 02:42:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
because n.korea is baiting the us into some sort of compromise. why wouldnt they want the other nations involved
2006-10-11 02:44:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by pdudenhefer 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Leogirl stole my thunder, but she is usually right on, just like me.
2006-10-11 02:43:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by El Pistolero Negra 5
·
0⤊
1⤋