Seems fair to me!
2006-10-11 01:57:45 · 8 answers · asked by Villain 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Why the double standard?
2006-10-11 02:03:43 · update #1
To be consequent and try to lead as a good example, yes we should. There is a discrepancy anyways between what we say and what we do.
In a way we should be the ones doing the disarming first. After all, we are the ones with most of the nukes. But i fear that the "fiscally responsible" neocons, the ones who gave us the record debt, will oppose this plan and use those nukes before we throw them away. After all, we paid for them, right?
2006-10-11 02:35:21 · answer #1 · answered by The answer man 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the UN were to vote on a resolution saying that the US should not build any more nukes then the answer is yes.
2006-10-11 09:01:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it would seem fair. But the world is not the kindergarten playground.
The United States and France can have nukes. North Korea and Iran cannot. Maybe it's "unfair," but that's the way the world is.
Love Jack
2006-10-11 09:03:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely. I wouldn't see anything wrong with conforming to the rules of the UN if we are making other countries do so.
2006-10-11 09:01:53 · answer #4 · answered by bluejacket8j 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes they should. Right after the UN has paid for all of its parking tickets.
2006-10-11 09:02:44 · answer #5 · answered by JohnRingold 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sure.
Do you work for the UN?
2006-10-11 09:00:56 · answer #6 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
HA HA Love it!
Absolutely!
2006-10-11 09:00:38 · answer #7 · answered by Ink 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Inspectors are welcome to come to the US and watch us make nuclear weapons.
2006-10-11 09:06:17 · answer #8 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋