2006-10-11 00:53:44 · 19 answers · asked by Matt E 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
No difference?
2006-10-11 00:55:00 · answer #1 · answered by Lady G. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, pushed to it, a screwdriver has more than one useful use.
However, and with lawyers, pushed to it, close to a sheer drop is the best place for this push, lawyers have no fu cking use at all.
2006-10-17 13:14:54 · answer #2 · answered by manforallseasons 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lawyer is seriously corrupt and expensive and a screwdriver is very useful
2006-10-17 13:33:43 · answer #3 · answered by ralphthemouth 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You use a screwdriver to screw things. A lawyer screws people.
2006-10-11 08:26:13 · answer #4 · answered by amp 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you use a screwdriver it doesn't cost you £800 an hour, and you can't fit a lawyer into a swiss army knife.
2006-10-11 09:00:09 · answer #5 · answered by prakdrive 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, ontologically speaking, I don't know.
But ordinarily speaking ,screwdrivers don't drink coffee.
2006-10-11 08:50:14 · answer #6 · answered by GreatEnlightened One 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A screwdriver does not tell the screw that it will mount an appeal after it has been screwed.
2006-10-17 17:41:36 · answer #7 · answered by karlrogers2001 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Screwdrivers, isn't that what Lawyers get P...sed on?
2006-10-14 10:24:55 · answer #8 · answered by lazydayz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was so cold this morning that I saw two lawyers walking down the street with their hands in their own pockets.
2006-10-11 08:40:22 · answer #9 · answered by chickenger 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like Brilock1's answer - having worked 'in the law' previously I can totally agree with their view point!
2006-10-11 09:33:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋