Hee hee, you make me laugh - I've often wondered this.
Yes, lower IQ = greater procreation...how else do you expect the world to end?
2006-10-11 12:07:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by mortyfint 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
IQ and the health of sperm/eggs are not related. People with a higher IQ will take longer before even searching for a mate. Then take time to find what they perceive to be the best fit in a mate. More time is spent in deciding on the best time to have a child (can we financially afford this, are we willing to change our life style to accommodate a child, etc). Once they have committed to having a child, more time is spent deciding on how many children they are willing to bring into their lives. Again they ponder the expense of child raising, education, etc. People with a lower IQ jump right into the raging hormone river and look surprised when pregnancy is the result. Seemingly unable to understand cause and effect, they keep right on having children. Their lives are as/more stress than the high IQ group, but that doesn't seem to get them into sex education classes very quickly. Only my opinion and a very broad generality.
2006-10-11 01:13:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by lollipop 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Having a lower IQ wouldn't increase a person's fertility, but it certainly would make a person ignore the consequences of sex without birth control.
Also a simple sex act that would result in pregnancy isn't something that requires intelligence. For a bored person without a lot of options as far as creative pursuits or mentally stimulating activity, "wham, bam, thank you ma'am" would be an activity of choice to pass the time for those not qualified nor having the inclination to keep a job. .
2006-10-11 03:55:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lady Sue 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
In all certainty, IQ, SAT and GPA do not do as lots for you as many people think of. GPA and SAT scores would help you get right into a needed college, however the form of faculty you bypass to does not consistently define how solid of a scientist you're. IQ's are frequently a competent indicator of educational overall performance, yet not consistently. some people have very intense IQ's yet warfare with specific teachers. If I have been you, i does not complication. college is in basic terms the 1st 4 years of your training. To be a Neuroscientist you will would desire to bypass onto graduate college. Your first 4 years of training will make little result. relatively, your graduate college overall performance would be of extra beneficial magnitude. @little one: An IQ of 185 isn't impossible. My fiance has an IQ over 2 hundred, and that's in accordance to Mensa assessments. There are lots people in the international who've intense IQ's. .one million% of the inhabitants seems small, even though it easily comes out to be a quite massive form. Thats tens of millions and 1000's of people in america of us of a that have an IQ greater than that.....
2016-12-16 05:49:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Simply being less intelligent doesn't mean you get tapped twice with a hoodoo fertility stick.
I'd say that those with a higher IQ tend to concentrate on their careers and decide to have children later in life, resulting in fewer children or none at all.
2006-10-11 01:01:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by mildly_adiktiv 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
You have come to the right place to ask this question buddy. Most of the people on this site have an IQ lower than plankton! In answer to your question though, I am inclined to say yes! The uneducated sub human scum with low IQ's do seem to have more kids and then the same cycle goes on and on and on..... etc.
2006-10-11 00:54:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Turbot Face 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well stats say the highest birthrates are the Hispanics and Blacks. So you figure the other part out from there!
2006-10-11 04:07:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think it's due to the fact that we are taught about contraception, hence the people who have no interest in learning (and therefore have a lower i.q) have no interest in learning how to prevent having a kid every time they have sex.
2006-10-11 01:01:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
So far, Paris Hilton has not proven this to be true.
2006-10-11 01:00:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by ValleyViolet 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes.... one of sciences greatest mysteries!!!
2006-10-11 00:56:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ellie29uk 3
·
0⤊
0⤋