English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I say bad but trying to be good...

2006-10-10 21:49:28 · 17 answers · asked by Sonny 2 in Family & Relationships Other - Family & Relationships

17 answers

I say both. It's in our nature to try and destroy each other (competition), and to keep our values and genes alive. It's also in our nature to forgive and care for people. To help when in need, even if we don't know the person. It's a messed up world if you ask me.

2006-10-10 21:54:20 · answer #1 · answered by PsyChoPath 3 · 0 0

Human beings are basically good. Some of us have been taught by society to be bad. I don't hate them , I pity them. Sometimes, to find the good in someone ,you have to look for it. Look hard enough and you will find it.

2006-10-10 22:20:31 · answer #2 · answered by mindtelepathy 5 · 1 0

i say human beings is the worse and the best becuase we have brain .
.The life mixs bitween bad and good people and a person is bad and good.
If you live with good people ,it is good ,if you live with bad people,it is bad..The answer depends on your choices,depend on where you are,who your friends are and how you live.

2006-10-10 22:08:59 · answer #3 · answered by lovely_kitty 1 · 0 0

Depends on the individual. It's a gray area, nobody is purely good or bad, just different mixtures of both.

2006-10-10 21:53:30 · answer #4 · answered by ladybugewa 6 · 1 0

A common point of debate among theologians focuses on the question, are human beings basically good or basically evil? The hinge upon which the argument turns is the word "basically." It is a virtual universal consensus that nobody is perfect. We accept the maxim: "To err is human."

The Bible says that "all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23). Despite this verdict on human shortcomings, the idea persists in our humanistically dominated culture that sin is something peripheral or tangential to our nature. Indeed, we are flawed by sin. Our moral records exhibit blemishes. But somehow we think that our evil deeds reside at the rim or edge of our character and never penetrate to the core. Basically, it is assumed, people are inherently good.

After being rescued from captivity in Iraq and experiencing firsthand the corrupt methods of Saddam Hussein, one American hostage remarked, "Despite all that I endured I never lost my confidence in the basic goodness of people." Perhaps this view rests in part on a sliding scale of the relative goodness or wickedness of people. Obviously some people are far more wicked than others. Next to Saddam Hussein or Adolf Hitler the ordinary run-of-the-mill sinner looks like a saint. But if we lift our gaze to the ultimate standard of goodness - the holy character of God - we realize that what appears to be a basic goodness on an earthly level is corrupt to the core..

Total depravity means radical corruption. We must be careful to note the difference between total depravity and "utter" depravity. To be utterly depraved is to be as wicked as one could possibly be. Hitler was extremely depraved, but he could have been worse than he was. I am a sinner. Yet I could sin more often and more severely than I actually do. I am not utterly depraved, but I am totally depraved. For total depravity means that I and everyone else are depraved or corrupt in the totality of our being. There is no part of us that is left untouched by sin. Our minds, our wills, and our bodies are affected by evil. We speak sinful words, do sinful deeds, have impure thoughts. Our very bodies suffer from the ravages of sin.

Perhaps "radical corruption" is a better term to describe our fallen condition than "total depravity." I am using the word "radical" not so much to mean "extreme," but to lean more heavily on its original meaning. "Radical" comes from the Latin word for "root" or "core." Our problem with sin is that it is rooted in the core of our being. It permeates our hearts. It is because sin is at our core and not merely at the exterior of our lives that the

2006-10-10 21:56:22 · answer #5 · answered by Viceroy of Jello 1 · 1 1

what about the bad that are trying to be bad,the good that are trying to be bad,the good that are trying to stay good...and let's not forget the ugly..

2006-10-10 22:01:02 · answer #6 · answered by melanie 3 · 0 0

Human beings!!!!!! sometimes are good but when they turn bad they are even terrable.

2006-10-10 21:55:47 · answer #7 · answered by zily 2 · 0 0

Both.. there are good and bad in everything.

2006-10-11 19:59:43 · answer #8 · answered by barbaradjt 5 · 0 0

simply 1 word 2 answer such a philosophical question that word is "YES"

2006-10-10 21:54:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Should never have covered the earth like they have.

2006-10-10 22:23:32 · answer #10 · answered by Julie A 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers