I don't know. But I can tell you it's strength and weakness.
Strength: It value each state as a different country, so to speak.
Weakness: Sometimes there will be a minority President. (President with more electoral votes but less popular vote)
2006-10-10 21:22:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by DWReyes 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Electoral college simplifies the voting process but it gives the loser with fewer number of votes to win. It must be eliminated because a candidate that actually garnered the most number of votes could lose in the election.
2006-10-10 21:48:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The electoral college is frequently defended on the thought throughout a right away attractiveness vote the exceedingly populated states could abuse their means against moderately populated states. i discover this a detrimental argument on 3 grounds. a million) in spite of if hispanics are a minority race, as are orientals, no-one has reported it needed to furnish them extra suitable votes to guard them against white electorate. in actuality it has not been needed. 2) It means electorate in moderately populated states have disproportionate means in keeping with individual. it is lots extra probably to bring about abuse, by way of fact the government can subsidize Vermont (207,0.5 in keeping with electoral vote) on the fee of long island (622,507 in keeping with electoral vote) and get thrice extra votes than it loses. This does seem the case, as protective cost lists and farming subsidies purely make experience once you recognize the farming states have disproportionate means. How does u.s. income from an export subsidy? answer: they don't, yet farmers do and that they have got extra political means than the persons in great cities who pay for them. 3) there are a number of styles of minority and one won't be able to supply all of them extra suitable representation. If rural human beings prefer extra suitable representation, why not racial minorities? Why not homosexuals? Why not human beings of minority faith like muslims? Why not the disabled?
2016-11-27 20:56:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is from an outdated system and it gives people the false feeling of being in power. there have been 4 instances of the populace vote being overturned the last one in bushes first run at the presidency. In the elections of 1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000, the candidate who received a plurality of the popular vote did not become president. we should do away with it or overhaul it.
2006-10-10 21:31:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by stanyazfan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it was desighed for a specific purpose that is outdated
2006-10-10 21:15:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋