Osama says "Al Andalus" (Spain) was stolen from the Muslims centuries ago. That's a legitimate grievance in your minds, right? If Spain lets itself be ruled by IslamoNazi's and theocratic mullahs and dictators, there'll be peace, right?
2006-10-10 19:07:19 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What a weird question to ask.
I'm not a Democrat but I'll add my two cents worth anyway. Spain was never Muslin, per se, even though there were decedents of Arabs living there at one time. But they weren't Muslin simply because they lived there prior to the formation of the Muslin religion. They were called Barbers. They never were anything more than a minority even back then.
Spain already has been ruled by many dictators, the last being Franco. And it's hardly likely that the people of Spain would be willing to let go of the democracy they've waited so long for.
It's simply not going to happen.
2006-10-10 19:37:30 · answer #1 · answered by Doc Watson 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For a initiate Al Qaeda could be heavily weakened if the hypocritical NeoCons stopped helping the Islamic Fundamentalist government of Saudi Arabia. that's the place all yet between the 9/11 hijackers got here from. the U. S. could additionally use its effect to construct an prolonged-lasting answer to the Arab-Israeli conflict which generates resentment from Arabs in the direction of the West. After this factor the U. S. dating with Arab international places could desire to be as no ore than paying for and advertising companions. the U. S. could then have not any involvement in the area and the Arabs could have not any reason to hate the U. S.. for my area I in basic terms think of that intervention in the affairs of yet another usa could desire to easily take place the place genocide happens or is in all probability to take place. whilst this did take place, which includes Rwanda in 1995, the U. S. and Britain definitely detrimental UN intervention and allowed the homicide of a million million Tutsis to take place. To summarise my answer a thank you to defeat Al Qaeda cant be a militia one, it must be political and aimed in the direction of scuffling with the reasons of terrorism. in the event that they only defeat Al Qaeda in conflict and the justifications it grew in the 1st place proceed to be, that's going to easily upward thrust lower back at a later date
2016-10-16 01:42:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're out of your mind. No, Spain should not surrender to terrorists. They don't deserve to rule over anything except their own section of Hell that's been reserved especially for them.
2006-10-10 19:17:16 · answer #3 · answered by Writer of Truth 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You're grossly overstating the strength of Al Qaeda.
Some people have really bought into Bush's fear and smear campaign.
2006-10-10 19:12:59 · answer #4 · answered by abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Spain surrendered after the train bombings. They voted in appeasment socialists.
2006-10-10 19:12:17 · answer #5 · answered by rjf 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
the more you guys talk about liberals/democrats... it becomes more painfully apparent how little you know about liberals/democrats...
you seem to be on the same level as the "liberals" that think every republican is a kiddie diddler...
2006-10-10 19:09:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes yes, and the muslims stole it from the spaniards originally. Irrelevant.
2006-10-10 19:12:45 · answer #7 · answered by notme 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
NO . Inch by inch , they want the world . Why should Spain cave in . WRONG .
2006-10-10 19:12:36 · answer #8 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We Americans should unconditionally surrender to Osama, so maybe he will have mercy on us.
2006-10-10 19:18:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Why would you ask such a thing?
No
Get a life
2006-10-10 19:09:18 · answer #10 · answered by Karce 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋