2006-10-10 18:05:48 · 5 answers · asked by cmrmcrod 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
i prefer tazers its more up close and personal
2006-10-10 18:08:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Teachers shouldn't need to be armed because chldren should by taught at home to respect their teachers, but considering current events, even police officers will tell you that a tazer is a most effective means to "take down" a threat without worry of serious injury. This is good because that "threat" can then be around to face a trial or whathaveyou. I would rather a tazer anyway so I don't have to worry if the wrong person gets ahold of the tranquilizer.
2006-10-11 12:10:23 · answer #2 · answered by zolnux 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Teachers should have concealable handguns in powerful calibers and training in how to use them. Tasers are too short-range to deal with an active shooter and tranquilizer guns take a while to take effect. Plus, both are pretty slow to reload. The best way to deal with an active shooter is with lethal force. Anything else is a fantasy or a death wish. Sorry.
2006-10-12 16:39:26 · answer #3 · answered by e_thunderburd 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes...the way things are nowadays..the teacher might not just save her own life, but the students as well.
2006-10-10 18:09:02 · answer #4 · answered by rhonda3826 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
let them have real guns so they can protect the kid
2006-10-10 19:04:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋