can't think of a single reason
2006-10-10 17:38:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by blank 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
they desire to proceed again in the time of. Mexican remittances 'back homestead' from united statesa. is their huge form one distant places source of earnings, even above sales of oil, in line with Fox. they do no longer like it to provide up. over the years, on condition that enormous employer is the only one that retains a persevering with eye on the government, troops and workers to the border could be shrink. A actual barrier could stay an inconvenience, completely. hence the day Fox visited a great form of final minute amendments went into the Senate invoice. One says we would desire to continuously seek for suggestion from with Mexico earlier construction any kind of a barrier (an exceptionally open ended requirement on timing). yet another says we would desire to continuously do a great learn seeing if there could be any detriment in besides in any respect in construction a barrier, which includes to our diplomatic family with Mexico. yet another provision has a 10 year statute of obstacles on border crossing, as though the wear and tear have been finished while the border crossing got here approximately, which may be a rolling amnesty going forward for persons who sneak in and cover, or forge records asserting they did, for a 10 year era. Mexico would not desire a wall, and the Senate would not seem to desire one the two.
2016-10-02 04:30:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
67,000,000 Dollars of hard earned ---by mostly the middle-class tax dollars--plus all the $$cost over-runs-- going to another defense contractor for a No-bid contract to do the work--that's 350,000 $$per mile of fence +++
How about employing 10 Border guards per mile for a year instead? How about investing that money in a national health care system? Why not finish the job in Louisiania and Mississippi First? How about developing a politically acceptable set of laws or a foreign policy with Mexico first? Is there any part of the fact that you should have a sore spot in your rectum that you need to better understand? Is this really the best possible solution? That fence will be swiss fricken cheese within months!!!!
And then what? We'll be right back where we started--just like we are now with North Korea!!
2006-10-10 17:45:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by scottyurb 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
I see it as I see gun control. All it does is spend a lot of money and accomplish nothing. The only things that will keep illegals from crossing the border is sufficient saturation of the border with border patrol personnel or having Mexico's corruption controlled to the extent that people can make a living there and feel no need to leave.
IMO the fence is a panacea and the only people it will impress are those who believe that disarming law abiding citizens will lower the crime rate.
2006-10-10 17:47:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by gimpalomg 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Mexico side or Canada side? Not to familiar with the geography down Mexico way but the wall to fence out Canada would be quite the accomplishment....don't think you have to many problems with Canadians though either.
2006-10-10 17:34:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Scott L 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because its a waist of money. Think about it, most Mexicans are getting through by tunneling under the existing barriors. How would a new wall help with the tunnels?
Waste of money IMO, just something else to take peoples mind off of the war.
2006-10-10 17:51:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
It is a carryover from the sixties to oppose ever thing the Government suggests. Lots of drugs used back then, still some brain damage is why they protest
2006-10-10 17:35:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by T C 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
it is a giant waste of money for starters...we have a hell of a lot more problems than people coming into this country todo jobs that we don't want to do anyway. it is a non-issue created by the media and the government to take away from our real problems.
2006-10-10 17:41:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Liberal Democrats don't want it because their voters will be stopped by the wall, and they want to pander to the Mexican voters here.
2006-10-10 17:35:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
How about because maybe someday soon, with everyone in the world hating the US , we might need to run out of the US. Canada can't take all of us...
2006-10-10 17:33:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tiny Jr. 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
it will stop all illegals from going home
like shutting the gate after the horse gets out
2006-10-10 17:38:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by sneaky41 3
·
2⤊
1⤋