English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061011/ap_on_go_co/us_nkorea_mccain

Kim Jomg IL threatened Bill Clinton that he was going to develop nuclear weapons, so Clinton sent him millions of dollars for food and services, hoping he would stop. Jong used the money to keep building nuclear weapons.

Bill the Coward

2006-10-10 17:18:27 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

19 answers

Just goes to show how appeasement doesn't work.

2006-10-10 17:21:10 · answer #1 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 2 1

No it's more like Bill Clinton started negotiations with North Korea. Had them sign a treaty which they re-negged on. There was a negotiation team in place and advice--given directly to Bush as Clinton left office. So what did Bush Do? His usual nothing, cut off negotiations, and then went after the only country in his "Axis of Evil" without oil---HMMMNNN Stick to that thing you do when your alone and keep the mental masturbation between your own ears.

2006-10-11 00:27:49 · answer #2 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 0 0

This blaming Bill Clinton BS is just the Republicans desperately trying to cover up the fact that they have sh*t the bed on this. Not by the way they've handled it, but by the fact that they've got all our military bogged down in Iraq when we didn't even need to be there in the first place. If we have to fight another war we're instituting a draft. It's the only feasible way we can defend ourselves. Who we should be calling out right now are the dumba**es who wasted our resources on something that wasn't a danger to us so the people who really are dangerous can see how vulnerable we really are and do whatever the hell they want.

2006-10-11 00:22:56 · answer #3 · answered by Reject187 4 · 1 1

Yeah, and he murdered Jesus Christ too, the Coward. Bush should murder everyone he doesn't agree with. It's a much better solution than diplomacy.

It's funny how Korea didn't set off Nuclear Bombs during the Clinton Administration. Wonder what that means?

2006-10-11 00:22:32 · answer #4 · answered by Reba K 6 · 1 2

he might of that is why we needed a pesident that needs a back bone but The president is damned if he does and damed if he dont so Look at bush everyone so pissed off bc he sent troops to show those cowards that they mess with us they get what is comming and what do we do holler at him and tell him owe the solders dont belong there and blah blah blah So whatever Yes if Clinton Knew this he should of done someithing about it instead of being a coward and worring about what others thought.

2006-10-11 00:23:44 · answer #5 · answered by knowssignlanguage 6 · 2 1

i think not. Bush got in and when korea said they were going to do that he went to war with iraq, which never said it happened. Korea said they did. I think we went after the wrong country. i think clinton was just trying to help korea so that they didn't feel the need to build a bomb . But it seems like you have a biased opinion already..

2006-10-11 00:22:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

what is Bush doing again?

OH THAT'S RIGHT... NOTHING...

the simple fact is... no one seems to know what to do... and North Korea is suspected to have nuclear weapons, at least to some degree, before Clinton even took office...

2006-10-11 00:29:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, this is just like Iraq. We appeased Korea just like Iraq, tried to work with them, and like Iraq North Korea can't be trusted and was simply taking advantage of the situation.

2006-10-11 00:30:27 · answer #8 · answered by Jake Lockley 3 · 0 0

Did you know that he signed the " No Dual Use Treaty" with China that basically said "We promise to use the USA's missile technology to put satellites into space and promise never to use this technology to fire long range nukes at the USA? How Stupid can one guy be?

2006-10-11 00:24:13 · answer #9 · answered by White Knight 3 · 1 0

No, Bill Clinton was Naive when it came to N. Korea. He as do many liberals think that if you just sit down and talk to them, and maybe throw some money there way, all will be rosy and fine with the world. It didn't work. Duh

2006-10-11 00:24:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Bill didn't allow anything! He was too busy with his personal life, to know what was going on, so leave him alone. Look on the bright side. He didn't abdicate to Hilary like he should have.

2006-10-11 00:24:52 · answer #11 · answered by T C 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers