2006-10-10 16:35:03 · 8 answers · asked by joe en 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Other - Business & Finance
No, I don't know Eaton's but Kmart sucks and deserves to die.
2006-10-10 16:37:30 · answer #1 · answered by seven_omega_4 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Kmart's downfall is their fault. This is like suggesting that Toyota and Honda should be blamed for Ford and GM's problems. Or like in 15 years blaming Target for Wal-Mart's fall.
2006-10-10 16:46:56 · answer #2 · answered by air_of_truth 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kmart is not bankrupt. This company bought Sears & Roebuck. I don't know about Eatons. Never heard of this company.
2006-10-10 16:39:08 · answer #3 · answered by beachbum72 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because that is one of the things that capitalism is all about: Competition. K-Mart was doing just fine, but Wal-mart came in and K-Mart just couldn't compete.
2006-10-10 16:43:32 · answer #4 · answered by nighthawk_842003 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
Although not all people like them, they have a right to do business. Until they violate monopoly rules, there is no issue.
Wal-Mart doing well is a sign that a significant amount of people LIKE shopping there.
2006-10-10 16:36:51 · answer #5 · answered by Molly 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, walmart has out grown all of the above. IT's not only a walmart now....its' a SUPER WALMART. lol
2006-10-10 16:43:45 · answer #6 · answered by Jess 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. if i were selling hotdogs and the guy next to me was selling hotdogs and he was doing better than me, i don't think it would be fair to say that my failure was his fault.
2006-10-10 16:42:59 · answer #7 · answered by KJC 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-10-10 16:36:50 · answer #8 · answered by jfont 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋