i vote for the big crush . . .
there are actually some hindu scriptures that suggest that the universe has "banged and crushed" numerous times.
2006-10-10 15:43:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by a_blue_grey_mist 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe a combination of the two. Perhaps what we are seeing now is how the known universe was actually created and will be created again. Perhaps, about the time that the galaxies travel far enough away from each other to create a gravitational imbalance the Milky Way, along with the Hydrogen cloud it is amassing, will collapse towards whatever the thing is that it is orbiting around and implode/explode creating another universe. The expansion, Big Bang, will not be as rapid because the singularity will not be expanding in a vacuum this time. Perhaps, the Milky Way is already headed towards a singularity. As the Hydrogen cloud becomes more dense it will begin to compress things towards the center attracting more Hydrogen and so on until the Milky Way becomes one giant star and eventually collapses and explodes creating a giant Nebula which eventually becomes gravitationally imbalanced as a result of the collapse of another giant star and a new universe is born.
If this sounds a little repetitious, it's because that's the way the universe is. Some would call it recreational. The universe will not die.
2006-10-10 18:11:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think the universe will "die", it may just cycle for ever between the "big expansion" and the "big contraction" The actual expansion is showing signs of slowing down, and it may at some point go into a reversal mode . In terms of time and observation it is just not possible to imagine what will happen. The universe is not a piece of clothing, to be ripped apart, the homeocentric application of thought to the undefinable phenomena of space does not help us to understand it's nature.
2006-10-10 19:08:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by willgvaa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
back, large question. MQ1: Kill em All is the excellent album from the checklist, even however I enjoyed tutor No Mercy too. MQ2: in this around i admire Peace Sells...yet who's procuring? The album call is my generic for a start up, and the songs in the album. The guitar solos in "devil's Island" and "stable Mourning/Black Friday" are remarkable. MQ3: Aww this is confusing! i might say a tie between Reign in Blood and grasp of Puppets. I very own the two albums and love the two. in certainty, the two albums are my generic albums from Slayer and Metallica respectively. i admire them using fact the guitar solos are only freakin' BADASS and how the songs are written and achieved...only undeniable mythical. MQ4: Rust in Peace MQ5: Seasons in the Abyss, using fact my generic Slayer music "ineffective pores and skin mask" is on it! BQ: My generic band out of the large 4 is in all possibility Slayer. Kerry King and Jeff Hannemann are the two remarkable guitarists and have produced close to impossible solos that i can in no way forget approximately in an entire life. on the different hand, Metallica is the 1st band out of the 4 i are becoming into, and Megadeth has the main influential albums. BQ3: international Painted Blood - exceedingly stable, whether not as stable as Slayer's older albums. dying Magnetic - lots extra valuable than St Anger Endgame - some stable solos yet i theory the songs have been slightly repetitive. we've Come for You All - have not listened to it yet. BQ4: errr...kinda i assume. they are the least admired out of the 4 BBBQ: confident you particularly do! BBBBQ: Slayer - Reign in Blood, Metallica - a tie between holiday the Lightning and grasp of Puppets, Megadeath - Peace Sells, Anthrax - between the residing
2016-10-19 04:31:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by jaisigh 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither.
Inflation shortly after the big bang created a "flat" universe. That is one that will expand forever at an ever decreasing speed. After a long while the expansion will almost, but not quite, stop.
Astronomers get all excited when someone measures the expansion and announces the result. But the measurements are imprecise, and could be showing a flat universe.
2006-10-10 19:05:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bob 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is mostly dependent on how much mass exists within the universe. Given the mass we KNOW is in the universe, it would expand forever. However there is also dark matter, which scientists are not sure how much of there is, and more specifically if there is enough to cause a collapse of the universe. Thinking about it though, it seems kind of selfish to think that this is the only time ever the universe has existed. It would seem more humble that we are only one of many (and probably infinite!).
2006-10-10 16:04:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by utbobert 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
ya i don't think that the universe gonna die.... cause everything in the universe is a cyclic process... the way the carbon gets cycled...or any elements in the periodic table is formed... or the life on earth is happening.... the fuel in stars ..... the way that the no of stars over any period of time remaining constant..... that is the rate at which the stars die equals the rate at which new stars are born
there is no meaning that universe is going to die.... if u say that there is gonna be a big crush then there is again that big bang is gonna happen....
2006-10-10 16:51:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I be live the Milky Ways doom is 7 1/2 million years from now.. When we collide with the Andromana galaxies and the Sun nova's and becomes a giant Black hole.. sucking everything into it.
2006-10-10 16:00:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by mr.longshot 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not really either. The universe is going to slowly disperse through the properties of diffusion.
2006-10-10 16:08:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chris J 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
big crush
2006-10-10 15:44:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by NapBon 1
·
0⤊
0⤋