English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just received in email, after all these months, and the fact she got $250,000 from the military, she has yet to get a headstone for her son's grave. She has been so busy crying "look at me" that she hasn't even asked the DOD for a free headstone.

2006-10-10 15:14:32 · 10 answers · asked by Meow the cat 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

10 answers

She's just another sad wacko nutball. She abandoned that poor kid a long time ago (I say poor because he sacrificed his life for his Country, not because she abandoned him), and I've heard recently that she's abandoned her other child. I saw that photo that showed her welded to Jesse Jackson's back. Maybe he's her new love. They would make a good pair but their kids would probably look like John Kerry.

2006-10-10 15:19:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

She did no longer get $250,000 from the militia; that's no longer the death income for somebody killed in wrestle. in case you had checked the internet you will have considered that the death income is $a hundred,000 and is going to the guy or persons listed as beneficiaries by the serviceman. human beings lie all of the time on the internet, yet no person bothers to verify data. and how do you recognize she has no longer bought a gravestone? in accordance to information comments, the family members has bought and put in one on his grave. the various subject would have been conflict between the husband and spouse, who have been dealing with divorce, additionally many families carry off putting stones up because of the fact they do no longer p.c. to settle for the death and the stone is an extremely final marker of that fact. there became a great tale that she did no longer even strengthen her son, that her exhusband did, yet that's no longer genuine, she and her husband divorced in 2005 after 28 years of marriage. i do no longer condone all of her strikes, some border on paranoia and she or he has slipped too deep into her reason--even criticizing the Rita coverage as in basic terms somewhat wind and water.

2016-12-26 15:43:08 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 3 · 0 0

David B,
that's a steaming pile of horsesh*t:

"Cindy Sheehan and her husband, Patrick, were high school sweethearts who wed while both were in their early 20's and who have been married to each other for over 28 years. (Neither has ever been married to anyone else.) The couple had four children together, of whom Casey was the oldest. Both parents raised Casey together"

http://ww[�Оopes.com/politics/war/sheehan.asp

2006-10-10 21:05:17 · answer #3 · answered by answer faerie, V.T., A. M. 6 · 0 1

shes a traitor. why the fck is she so mad, he wanted to go a 2nd time. shes a lousy mother dirtbag who gave up custody of him and his half brother as well.
people die in war you hag ( aimed at sheehan ) youre just a scumbag cashing in on his name, your son is rolling over in his grave. YOU are a disgrace Cindy, pure and simple. IF you didnt want him to die, then you shouldve begged himnot to go, even your own family says youre acrack head and oh yeah cindy where were you for the first gulf war? huh where were you protesting then and the vietnman was at that you retard!
this woman is vile

2006-10-10 15:35:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Because the Revolutionary Communist Party(which controls the "World Can't Wait" front group) tells her she has to blame Casey's death on President Bush, and not the Mehdi Army, which actually killed him.

2006-10-10 16:03:37 · answer #5 · answered by ddey65 4 · 1 1

Leap in logic alert! Woman fails to mourn properly because she has an important mission, and she hates her son!

2006-10-10 15:22:31 · answer #6 · answered by tiko 4 · 1 2

She doesn't.
You just hate here so much that you believe she does. BTW have you personally been to her son's grave to verify that?

2006-10-10 15:22:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Probably because the far left, who controls her, hasn't given her permission to do that yet.

2006-10-10 15:20:50 · answer #8 · answered by gizzardout 3 · 2 2

Unless you have spoken to her, all you have is a vicious opinion

2006-10-10 15:31:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Of coarse she doesn't, why would you even ask such a stupid question.

2006-10-10 15:52:19 · answer #10 · answered by Luke F 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers