sugar,alcohol/rum and slaves who will do any task that one demands of them!!!!who needs a reason for that???if all things were equal as they were in africa blacks enslaved blacks for the great value that they saw in the equation themselves!!!gods!!to have all your work done by friday!!and then you don't have to pay him!!i've gone unpaid many times for all of my labors on peoples behalf's,i've been cheated and robbed,lied to and cozened by businessmen in america until i can't make a living working!!!!slavery wasn't ever good but at the least you were fed and housed and allowed to breed more slaves!! a freeman today has it alot harder in many ways!!zero population clinics want to sterilize everybody but the rockafellerswho fund the eugenically oriented organization of racists and robber barons!!!try to just build a house for yourself lately!!!the most common of human propensities has been made an impossibility..and tell me that you're free!!!this system needs an enema!!!try to drive your own horse and cart down a road lately to market without getting waylaide by some knight errrant claiming the cart is his to seize and sell at will because you haven't paid this license or that to own what you're allowed to by someone that you've never met???and you think you're free!!please!!!
2006-10-10 15:27:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by eldoradoreefgold 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Best way to think about this is because slaves were seen as a respectable tool for a labor force. And looking where slaves came from and where they were needed, traders looked how they could best optimize the amount of room in their cargo holds. In process still bringing all the goods that the colonies needed as well as the African outposts. So traders decided they would first transport all the processed goods to Africa/North America that the colonies wanted from England. When they sailed to Africa and traded a good portion of their goods they had space in their cargo holds. So to make more money they took slaves to the West Indies and North America maximizing their profit. They had to travel to the West Indies/ North America because that is where England recieved its raw resources from. Then from North America get raw goods to be brought back to England to be manufactured into processed goods. The cycle would then repeat over and over again.
This is a nice explanation and graph of the process one should be in your history book if you looked at it. If there isn't here it is http://members.tripod.com/lylesj/trade/tritrade.html.
Also I'm sure your school doesn't condom plagiarism so please give credit by citing your information that way you can back up your answers if a teacher starts to question you.
2006-10-10 15:28:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Piotr 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
synthetic products (additionally making use of colonial uncooked textile) from Europe or New England to Africa, Slaves from Africa to the plantation colonies, uncooked plantation textile (which comprise cotton, indigo, sugar, tobacco, espresso) to Europe and New England. different products have been carried on the side, yet those made the majority. the united states of a have been divided of their place: the northern colonies had no plantations yet a budding business base, and imported uncooked textile from the southern states and the caribbean. different powers in continental Europe did a similar triangular commerce, commencing with Portugal (to Brasil) and Spain and later joined by making use of France, England, Netherlands and Denmark, the minor powers often with plantations in the Caribbean islands and Guyana. Germany and Italy have been contemporary in the process the Habsburg link to Spain.
2016-10-19 04:27:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by oleyar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Profit
2006-10-10 19:05:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by brainstorm 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
PROFIT
2006-10-10 15:03:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Penney S 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
GREED !
2006-10-10 16:17:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by ny21tb 7
·
0⤊
0⤋