English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-10 14:58:12 · 4 answers · asked by aaron h 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

Yes, we have fire insurance, but the insurance company is not wanting to pay for that.

2006-10-10 15:03:57 · update #1

4 answers

The answer is - it depends on what is in your policy. In virtually every case, however, your propery insurer should cover water damage caused by (or resulting from) a fire.

Here's the way the policy (probably) works: The policy covers accidental damage to your property. It then EXCLUDES perils not covered (floods, nuclear explosions, etc.).

But it does not end there. The policy will often exclude water damage (floods), but covers fire damage.

The water damage was the "result" or "arose out of" a covered peril, and is therefore probably covered.

One would need to see the policy and know the particulars of your matter to determine the extent of coverage.

Good luck.

2006-10-10 15:03:23 · answer #1 · answered by robert_dod 6 · 0 0

Contact your insurance company

2006-10-10 15:05:36 · answer #2 · answered by Dave 4 · 0 0

Damage naturally resulting from a covered peril is covered. You may not have coverage for fire though.

2006-10-10 15:01:01 · answer #3 · answered by Catspaw 6 · 0 0

THOUGHT TAT WENT HAND IN HAND

2006-10-10 15:00:07 · answer #4 · answered by Penney S 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers