a. Less than two years.
b. 2-5 years
c. 5-10 years
d. More than 10 years
e. Never, ever.
Inspired by the Supreme Court's decision today.
http://www.wric.com/Global/story.asp?S=5523012
All haters will be reported.
2006-10-10
14:16:33
·
19 answers
·
asked by
GreenEyedLilo
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Cultures & Groups
➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Summexicandude, I *said*....
Anyway, if someone's asking you, all you have to do is say no.
2006-10-10
14:30:29 ·
update #1
Summexicandude, I *said*....
Anyway, if someone's asking you, all you have to do is say no.
2006-10-10
14:30:36 ·
update #2
b. if we really fight hard for it.
e if we get careless.
2006-10-10 14:22:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by mystic_lonewolf22 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
I'm not sure it's possible to predict how long it will take, simply because it all depends upon who gains or retains political power. Right now the right wing Republicans have power, and they want to roll back civil rights for women and minorities and have been actively doing so for years, so if they remain in power there's no chance of gay rights advancing at all. If the left wing and Democrats manage to wrest power from the religious right, there's a chance that there will be advances in gay rights. However, they'll still take time to give women and other minorities the rights that have been taken from them under the Republicans, and then they'll have to be cautious at first to avoid a sudden political upset.
So it'll take time for everyone who isn't a straight WASP male to get equal rights. But I do think that gay marriage will be legal in 10-20 years, and I also suspect the US will be the last holdout among first world countries on the issue, much like with socialized medicine.
2006-10-10 15:54:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Fraggle 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
d or e, because I think that there will always be someone to protest against it. People just can't let other people live their lives the way that they want to. I have some very good friends who are gay, lesbian, and bisexual. They tend to be alot more open minded about some things than my hetero friends. When this comes up for a vote, I will among those voting FOR it. Why should these classes of people be denied the chance at happiness or having a child? Why should they be denied the tax benefits that are given to other married couples?
2006-10-10 15:04:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by jen2192000 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Never, ever. I sincerely think it is more likely that homosexuality will be outlawed again in America than it is there will be same sex marriage. This question should not have ever had to have been asked in my opinion, it should have been legal since day one in America.
Homosexuals make up the smallest political group, and as evidenced in the last election by the conservatives, and the current scandal by the liberals, are the easiest to target for politcal gain.
Marriage is a legal contract, not a "sacred" event. It *is* sacred in many *religions* and SHOULD BE to those who practice those religions and bound by the defitions of those religions for their practioners. Oposition to gay marriage is not based on the Bible, the Bible defines mariage as more than just between one man and one woman, it is also defined as between Christ and the Church, etc.
Many religions and cultures allow for marrying of children even children to adults, and that is called "sacred" as long as it is male/female!? Seems a bit odd to me. Marriage should be viewed by government bodies as a contract between consenting adults.
Not allowing or encouraging gays to "marry" or partner is destructive for everyone. Not allowing gay marriage will not result in fewer gays because of it soley. I fear both parties will continue to play games with the homosexual community to the detriment of all Americans. There is room for everyone.
If 70%+ of hetero marriage ends in divorce how can allowing gay marriage weaken it? Is someone afraid that the combined numbers might go up in divorce or down? The sky has not fallen in ANY country that has legalized gay marriage, why are we so afraid it will here?
Giving rights increases Freedom, Tolerance, and PEACE. Singling out one group AND passing laws that further alienate them only creates tension and pain. Maybe the day will come when people will be free to be who they really are, love who they want to, and be allowed to protect the ones they love just like everyone else... But I don't see it coming in my life time, not in this country at least.
2006-10-10 15:17:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by wtonysimpson 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
The way the haters abd Bigots are here....
D.
The repugs were running an ad against a Dem candidate here and used the fact that he didn't vote to make marriage exclusively heterosexual as an attempt at a slam against him...
Funny thing, that's given HIM the gay vote for sure.
2006-10-10 14:23:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
The answer is E. because just like in every issue in America, (ex. immigration, abortion, war) not every person will be persuaded to join only one side. Every issue is split with supporters and opposers no matter what.
EDIT: what are you talking about? why is my name being mentioned? If you are referring to so-called "hate speech" I never called anyone a name of any sort. I was just stating my opinion which it seems no one can do on here anymore. But just in case, I took off that first part.
2006-10-10 14:29:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by summexicandude06 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Probably more than 10 years. It takes people a long time to adjust to new things
2006-10-10 14:33:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by penny 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
The Supreme courts refusal to hear the case is a clear violation of this couple's civil rights to have their grievences heard. I'm sure this will not be the end of it...and I hope they continue their fight!
2006-10-10 18:32:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by DEATH 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I was watching a special on the civil rights movement in the 60s. I dont think gays will get full equality until they get off their asses and really protest like blacks did in the 60s. Until then we have to settle for second class citizens.
2006-10-10 14:50:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Oh,hmm i want to say B,but Supreme Court makes me say D or even E. They seem to have their minds set. Maybe when we get a gay president.Lol!
2006-10-10 15:31:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by sexygal8321 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'm hoping and think realistically it will be c. If more states like Masaachusetts, and city mayors like Gavin Newsom in San Francisco start speaking up more this can happen
2006-10-10 17:21:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋