English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

also, i think women do a better job of being in charge of everything. what do ya think? they're smarter, make better decisions. i truly believe women should be in charge of everything.

2006-10-10 14:02:53 · 15 answers · asked by hello. 1 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Other - Cultures & Groups

15 answers

WOW! I am truly amazed! i never thought i would hear a guy saying something like that! are you gay. Dont get me wrong i am happy about your comment but there so many machos out there that wouldn't agree with you. but am so happy for you! i think women do no deserve to have a say in every decision. I think is more about equality. but thanks.

2006-10-10 14:09:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I've thought the same thing at times but then I remember they are all catty hoes at some level. Did you miss that primetime special. A woman can be as bad as a man and vica versa. The qualities your atributing to women are sexless as well as those you labeling as masculin.

Ok after reading the other answers I have to edit. Why if a man thinks this does he have to gay? And why do you say it in an insulting way? Like I said I thought this way for a while but these answers show women and men are no different. That means sweetiethatcares ya'll aren't any smarter or better your equal.

2006-10-10 21:15:21 · answer #2 · answered by veritas8463 2 · 1 0

They are ON AVERAGE, better.

Just wait, during the Presidental debates we are going to get to see a cat-fight!

Actually, I agree and disagree with you. There shouldn't be any Pro-Women-in Government Laws, but organizations, yes.


It's still wrong to vote for a female only because she's a female.
Our voters aren't sexists.
There are more women than Men in the U.S.
Why don't they vote for a women?

The problem here is that, so far, neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party have supported a female and put her name on the balet. That's all that's needed.

A majority of Women in the government wouldn't be a bad thing, but it shouldn't be over 65% of one sex either way. (I KNOW that there are over 65% men now).

Yeah, women are under represented.

It's still wrong to vote for anybody because of sex.



Can I ask, what is your question?

2006-10-10 21:19:22 · answer #3 · answered by husam 4 · 0 0

Of course!
With all these idiot men we've been having for president and the way the U.S.
is going, financially and socially (other countries), you would think someone would see a pattern!
Even so, they appear to be getting stupider and more incompetent every election!
Take Bush for example; he hasn't made many changes that helped, mostly ones that hurt us badly. With the war in Iraq, the sky-high oil prices, nuclear
debates, hidden WMD's and all of this other foolish nonsense that has cropped up over the last few years!

With the elections less than two years away, I take pain in finding out who is next up to harass our country!

I pray to GOD that we won't be overrun by another pervert like Bush!
You must think me somewhat of a girl by demeaning man like this but Bush is no more of a man than I am a woman!!!

Cheers to all and good night.
-Amarantine

2006-10-10 21:26:42 · answer #4 · answered by Ammy 6 · 1 0

You have a woman's pic on display, but anyway. Anyone as long as they do a good job. Women have a softer touch with things. The only problem is that the last time a woman was at the head of the English gvt, that was Thatcher, not the best example, is it ?

2006-10-10 21:06:09 · answer #5 · answered by Jazz 4 · 2 1

Yes, I agree, I admired Margaret Thatcher, she earned a reputation for being the first woman prime minister who won 3 consecutive terms.

2006-10-10 21:24:18 · answer #6 · answered by dtmc542006 3 · 2 0

I disagree that women should run everything. I do think that women and men should have equal jobs and authority. If you are a man why is your avatar a women?

2006-10-10 21:05:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

So you would vote for a candidate merely because of gender? No reference to her views, ideas plans agenda? That is a very reckless means to choose someone to run a country of near 300 million

2006-10-10 21:06:00 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 3 0

i'm a woman and i don't think so. if she didn't take her midol and had a mood swing...BOOM!- no more middle east. it'd get rid of the problem, yes, but there's a huge chunk of the globe missing! that would also be cutting off d***s don't you think? guys shouldn't have to answer to a women when they're the head of the house hold. yes women are smarter and better, but men are the heads and women are the necks.

2006-10-10 21:09:51 · answer #9 · answered by sweetiethatcares 3 · 2 3

You may change your mind when you discover most women are not as dominant as your mother... you may have to move out of home to find out.. That dominance is only effective in your house however. She won't be tolerated out in society.

2006-10-10 21:39:12 · answer #10 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers