2006-10-10 13:58:25 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
There were no Democrats.
Seriously. The militias, who were not regular army, helped greatly by not fighting according to the standard battlefield techniques. They would often flank the British troops engaged musket to musket with the Continental Army.
2006-10-10 14:02:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They made friends with the British. They realized that if they only understood the British point of view and stopped shooting them, the British would stop attacking them. Most of all they realized that it was demeaning for everyone involved to gather intelligence by questioning POW's
I am sorry, I was mistaken. I thought you asked how the Liberals today would have fought the war. If that were to happen we would be an agriculture province of Great Britain.
Actually with the help from the French, could you imagine counting on the French today? They were a real country back then.
2006-10-10 21:03:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The British supply line was too long and their tactics tended to force neutrals into siding with the Patriots.
2006-10-10 21:07:20 · answer #3 · answered by Joe Cool 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
guerilla warfare,terrorism and the french...oddly all the things these republicans seem to dislike so much are the things that gave us this great country.apparently republicans dont read very much,and lets try to remember that republicans in our history are not the multi-national corprate pigs they are today,for example lincoln was a republican
2006-10-10 21:08:41 · answer #4 · answered by seth s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Superior battle tactics and the help of France.
2006-10-10 21:01:59 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because none of them were liberals.
2006-10-10 21:01:47 · answer #6 · answered by Wayne H 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋