It's so horrible right now, but wait until the world is over populated.
I personally know a great amount of people who should have been swallowed.
2006-10-10 13:55:20 · 20 answers · asked by heroinglitter 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No, but they may come up with some law requiring birth control. They should already have one for teens, but only when they invent a birth control method with no side effects or dangers. Then they should require all people under a certain age to have it. This would cut down abortions and unwanted children as well.
2006-10-10 14:02:25 · answer #1 · answered by AveGirl 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Overpopulation is a myth. there is plenty of arable land to grow plenty of crops to feed everyone. The technology exists to even plant land that would not normally sustain crops.
The problem with the gap between the rich and the poor is an unwillingness of amny 3rd world nations to allow help inside their borders. Countless tons of grain are shipped and go to the rats because despots and dictators refuse to allow it to be distributed. that would mean healthy people who could rise up against their regime.They might even- GASP- become self sufficient and want some radical government- like a democracy. Keep em on the brink of starvation, and people won't fight back and risk losing what little help they receive.
Do your homework. "popul;ation control" is nothing more than ORGANIZED GENOCIDE. Who should have abortions/ birth control? The POOR? the DISABLED? Why? And why is that any different than saying the Jews don't deserve life?
Once you decide that ANY human being has no right to exist, you call into question your OWN right to exist.
2006-10-10 21:09:36 · answer #2 · answered by Mommy_to_seven 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I know a lot of people that should be retroactively aborted but no I do not think that overpopulation is a problem.
Look at the most populated places on Earth Hong Kong and Singapore, tons of people yet very wealthy. I believe that there are more complex issues to providing for a population than population control. Look at the USA and Europe our replacement population is not enough, we are importing people.
2006-10-10 20:59:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Not quite sure what you mean. 'Mandatory abortion'? 'Mandatory sterilisation', perhaps, but 'Mandatory abortion'? Which woman is going to get pregnant, knowing that she will be forced to abort?
'who should have been swallowed'? A bit crude, don't you think?
I wonder if there are any people who might have the same thoughts about you?
2006-10-10 21:05:09 · answer #4 · answered by Tokoloshimani 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The day when it becomes mandatory, is the day when the human population will no longer exsist.
2006-10-10 21:24:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
they cannot even kill peopel who are in prison who should die, do you think they would kidnap pregnant women off the street and make them have an abortion, (maybe you should have been swallowed), but aside from that i woudl think they would give tax breaks, if you only had one child versus several.
2006-10-10 21:02:59 · answer #6 · answered by sevenout7 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It already is, for some workers in the Marianas Islands.
2006-10-10 21:11:01 · answer #7 · answered by answer faerie, V.T., A. M. 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree.
Too many stupid people are being allowed to live & screw up this country even more just becase thier mommies & daddies think abortion is evil.
1 family, 1 child for the next 40 years, I say!
2006-10-10 21:00:10 · answer #8 · answered by Lauren C.: Led-head 4 (∞) 4 · 0⤊ 6⤋
Let me ask you this... Do you think MURDER will ever be mandatory?
2006-10-11 00:43:21 · answer #9 · answered by Wicked 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but I bet euthanasia will be required someday.
2006-10-10 20:59:32 · answer #10 · answered by Cerulean 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋