Circumcision will diminish the feeling for the woman as she won't feel the skin ripple up and down which gives the intensity of the orgasm..
2006-10-10 11:00:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by tucksie 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Here's your answer: I knew a guy from Iran, who was circumcised after he had already had sex! (his parents lived way out in the country, or something). I guess he was about 15? Anyway, he said there was ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE between the sensation of sex with or without the foreskin.
This is just one guy, granted, but you also asked about preference. MOST women I talked to over the years (as a sex educator and friend) PREFERRED CIRCUMCISED PENISES!!!
Yes, I know there has been a big movement to stop it as a barbaric practice, but somehow, millions of Jews and Muslims and up 'til recently, about 70% or more, of American boys, have had it done and *gasp*...SURVIVED intact!
The ones pushing NON-circumcision are usually Crunchy-granola types who also think it's evil to kill wheat...or whatever...you get the idea!
There is much statistical evidence to show that:
a) women prefer circumcised penises, both for aesthetic reasons and for cleanliness,
b) partners of circumcised males have a lower incidence of cerivcal cancer and infection
c) circumcised penises are easier to keep clean...SO...
You never have to have that awful, embarrassing talk w/your son about SMEGMA and what to do with it! UCK!
IMO, anything that stops cancer and makes women happier w/sex is okay by ME!!!!
As for female circumcision? IT's totally barbaric and WRONG!!!
2006-10-10 18:09:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gwynneth Of Olwen 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Are you concidering doing this?is that why you wont answers?
yes i have had both and would choose the circumsised penis over the uncircumsised,one they dont smell as much and there is nothing worst then pulling bk the forskin when you play with it,yes i do believe getting any son i had done, as i think it much healthy and more pleasureing for the female.
2006-10-10 18:02:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by staffie lover from Aussie 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I prefer uncicumcised, because it is more sensitive, intercourse is more enjoyable, no by boy is not circumcised
2006-10-10 18:12:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by acid tongue 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I've been with both, and I prefer circumcized because my uncircumcized partner had to hold back the skin, and it was a huge pain. I also think it wasn't as hygenic.
I've had two sons now, and I had them both circumcized.
2006-10-10 17:59:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Katyana 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Unclipped is kinda creepy to me. Too much extra skin to be bothered with. I've seen it, but not interested in experiencing it. I'd clip 'em. If not, in the future it could cause odor problems, resulting in sexual problems.
2006-10-10 18:00:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by ฿└ΛÇκ ĦΘŁỀ ŞЏП 3
·
2⤊
0⤋