Yes, I've been with both circumcised and uncircumcised men.
I didn't have a preference sexually. My husband is circumcised, although he's mentioned he might want to restore. I can honestly say I've only had one bad lover and he was circumcised. But him being cut had nothing to do with it. He would have been a bad lover with or without foreskin. It is true what some say about cut (circumcised) men needing to thrust a little harder and how you need more lube. But I can't say I really prefer one to the other in terms of lovemaking. I prefer the look of a natural, uncut male because knowing how much pain they were in and how half of their penis was cut off against their will makes me very sad. Oh well!
I can't say the intercourse felt any different because I was unmarried and used condoms all the time. But I do believe the circumcised men had to thrust harder, as does my husband who is cut (we obviously don't use condoms now that we're married).
I have NOT circumcised our sons we have together. I am a nurse and I work in OB. I know circumcisions are not medically recommended as a routine type of infant procedure and I know they are very painful for the babies. So even though my husband is cut, my boys are intact (uncircumcised). I'd never imagine cutting off a part of healthy part of my son or daughter!
Parents who think circumcision is a good idea should really research the facts and watch this video:
http://intact.ca/vidintro.htm - at the bottom of the page you can download the video. It's very realistic.
I honestly don't know that many modern-day doctors or nurse who do circ their own children anymore. It's just not necessary.
2006-10-10 17:46:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Girl named Sue 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Have you had both circumcised and uncircumcised partners? Yes
Which do you prefer? Why? How did intercourse feel different?
No preference it did not feel any different to me although I understand uncircumcised men have a much more pleasurable experience then circumcised men.
would/did u circumcise your boys?
NO if boys were ment to be without a forskin they would be born that way. Why would I risk my childs health risking complication and decreasing the quality of his sex life in the future, There is nothing unhygenic about an uncicumcised penis and more boys are now uncircumcised then circumcised.
2006-10-10 18:04:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by CowtownMummy 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
Havent had much experience with uncircumcised but knowledgeable. Which do I prefer? Circumcised of course, and yes I had my boys circumcised. Wouldn't have it any other way.
2006-10-11 09:37:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
i am sad that i have never been with an intact man and have never had sex the way nature intended it.
I mourn the loss of my Dhs foreskin everytime I have to see the huge scar and everytime we have to use lube for sex:-(
I left my son whole because it was not my body to chop parts off of. His body his choice.
As for hygiene; what kind of perverted logic does it take to think that an open wound in a feces filled diaper is cleaner? An inact girls labia is far more difficult to clean.
As for older children and adults; infections are no excuse for amputation! Why is it that girls get antibiotics and not surgery? Doctors in this country are very uninformed about the foreskin and its functions, so when they see one, they want to cut it off instead of learning how to care properly for one.
The whole circumcision prevents STDs MYTH is a farce too. Condoms help prevent STDs, not surgery. Otherwise, why would the USA have the highest circumcision rates and the highest AIDs rate of any industrialized nation?
Plus, newborns don't have sex!
Newborns do feel pain more intensely than adults and the pain reaction can cause them to go into shock. Thats why the uninformed think that an newborn can "sleep" through having his genitals penetrated, sliced, crushed and amputated with nothing but a pacifier dipped in sugar to help the pain.
Parents today are not blindly following a tradition that was started in the Victorian era to curb masturbation. Today's parents are questioning circumcision!
2006-10-10 18:27:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Terrible Threes 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
I cricumicised both of my sons because it is more hygenic. My dad was not circ'd as an infant and when he was 6 months old got an infection and had to have it done. My Grandma says it was much worse for an older baby than a newborn.
2006-10-10 17:59:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by mommysrock 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
hi there, my eldest son was circumcised when he was 16 months old, his little tail used to be all red a swollen when he wanted a wee, and he also had urine infections, so this wasn't really optional it was medical, after he had it done, he was in pain (obviously) but no more infections...
i hope this helps
Yvonne
2006-10-10 18:06:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I prefer circ'd
more appealing looking- not a odd turtle head
son is circ'd
2006-10-10 18:03:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mopar Muscle Gal 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Both and prefer cut, I would and did have my son done.
2006-10-10 18:00:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I have had both and I prefer circumsied
2006-10-10 17:58:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
We had our son circumsised. Hygiene and social reasons.
2006-10-10 18:04:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by kentata 6
·
1⤊
1⤋