than $2 million is not earned, is not fair, is theft, is injustice, which is evergrowing, which is misery [war, crime, violence, tyranny, slavery, destruction of the state, and now, thanks to e=mc2, nuclear winter, frozen planet, triple iceage]?
[pls answer the question, seriously, sincerely soberly, or not at all - ie, try to resist the temptation to give a silly useless pointless jokey reply, which makes me despair]
2006-10-10 10:39:06 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Economics
agreed
2006-10-10 10:40:19 · answer #1 · answered by Henry_Tee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd really like to but I don't understand what you're asking given the way you've phrased it. As far as jokey or whatever go, you'll be lucky to get responses at all. I suggest you edit and clarify.
2006-10-10 10:41:53 · answer #2 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pls ASK the question soberly!
I have no idea what you're talking about!
Read it back to yourself and see if YOU can honestly make sense of it!
2006-10-10 10:41:34 · answer #3 · answered by Blackbird 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no it proves that the persons talent or ethic or idea was inadequate to carry him past that mark. someone else builds a better mousetrap or has a better marketing acumen or can organize a more effective work force or has access to more capital can always surpass your efforts.
2006-10-10 10:44:39 · answer #4 · answered by Norman 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋