English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

I would pick John Edwards hands down but I must say it's really a shame concerning Condi Rice. I think she's an extremely intelligent, talented woman who if allowed to speak what she really thinks instead of puppeting for Bush would make a great leader. I hope for her sake she can break free from that one day and be able to show her true talents.

2006-10-10 11:22:38 · answer #1 · answered by carpediem 5 · 2 0

John Edwards

2006-10-10 17:37:17 · answer #2 · answered by Calee 6 · 1 1

Edwards is the only chance the Dems have in 2008. And Rice isn't a career politician so she wouldn't even get a run.

2006-10-10 17:46:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Edwards, even african americans wont vote for condi! Wait a minute nevermind the Repulicans don't count their votes anyway.

2006-10-10 18:54:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

John Edwards, hands down.

2006-10-10 17:35:17 · answer #5 · answered by brian2412 7 · 2 2

Let's see, State Dept hack vs slimy trial lawyer whose major victories were won on emotion instead of actual facts pertinent to the case. Can I have door Number 3 Monty?

2006-10-10 17:37:33 · answer #6 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 2 0

Condi

2006-10-10 17:36:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

John Edwards,maybe.Well that could change next week.

2006-10-10 17:35:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

3rd Party. The D's and R's suck at governance, and the last 150+ years is proof.

2006-10-10 17:38:12 · answer #9 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 2 0

Edwards. Can I have my vote COUNTED too in an HONEST election?

2006-10-10 17:38:52 · answer #10 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers