I would pick John Edwards hands down but I must say it's really a shame concerning Condi Rice. I think she's an extremely intelligent, talented woman who if allowed to speak what she really thinks instead of puppeting for Bush would make a great leader. I hope for her sake she can break free from that one day and be able to show her true talents.
2006-10-10 11:22:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by carpediem 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
John Edwards
2006-10-10 17:37:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Calee 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Edwards is the only chance the Dems have in 2008. And Rice isn't a career politician so she wouldn't even get a run.
2006-10-10 17:46:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Edwards, even african americans wont vote for condi! Wait a minute nevermind the Repulicans don't count their votes anyway.
2006-10-10 18:54:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
John Edwards, hands down.
2006-10-10 17:35:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by brian2412 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Let's see, State Dept hack vs slimy trial lawyer whose major victories were won on emotion instead of actual facts pertinent to the case. Can I have door Number 3 Monty?
2006-10-10 17:37:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Crusader1189 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Condi
2006-10-10 17:36:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
John Edwards,maybe.Well that could change next week.
2006-10-10 17:35:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
3rd Party. The D's and R's suck at governance, and the last 150+ years is proof.
2006-10-10 17:38:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by sjsosullivan 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Edwards. Can I have my vote COUNTED too in an HONEST election?
2006-10-10 17:38:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
3⤊
1⤋