Iran says it will not retreat on nuclear development. What should Bush do in light of problem with N Korea?

Question

Iran has given some inspectors access. N Korea still says it wants bilateral talks but Bush refuses. What should the US do about these countries' very real nuclear programs?

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-10-10-iran_x.htm

Answer 1

North Korea has a real program. Iran's program is in its infancy, and not expected to get anywhere in the next few years unless you only listen to what the Bush administration says. Other nations who have verified Iran's status don't have the same concerns, but then they are not trying to conquer the middle east like Mr. Bush.

Answer 2

Thats a hard question to answer. North Korea's leader is been menaly ill. It has been proven that he is insane. Iran is just as crazy as N. Korea. If we answer their demands then whats too say that in a year they don't do it again. If we ignore them whats to say they don't launch on us. If we attack them they will attack us or our allies. What are we to do? What is the world to do? No one knows. I ask if we do have to go to war with these nations whats the problem with sending covert opretavis in and taking out any chance they have of launching nukes. While there at it take out their leaders. Hell we have the technology, why don't we completely alter some good people's look so they could take their place at the head of those governments. Sadam did it, he had look alikes running around. The one thing that we have to make sure never happens is a nuclear war. A nuclear war will be the end of us all.

Answer 3

There fairly is not any distinction between republicans and democrats anymore. they improve some warm button subjects like abortion or public well being care to distract the same old public on an analogous time as our attain for empire and administration of ingredients maintains unabated. The administrations might exchange however the backstage gamers stay an analogous. coverage in no way adjustments. Iran is merely no longer allowed to have a nuclear weapon. We wouldnt be waiting to get our oil without their permission. So get waiting for a huge warfare.

Answer 4

We should work with the other asain countries in the region to talk with N Korea. They have more say with them.
Now Iran. We gave them those Nuclear reactors and told them they could use them for energy only and not to break the seals. They did that. so we should just go over there and bomb the hell out of the Nuclear reactors we gave them. They have no right to do what they are doing.

Answer 5

His approach to NK was the only logical thing he could do: State ahead of time that if the nukes get used or even wind up in the hands of a terrorist group, he will hold Kim directly responsible. The same statement is appropriate in Iran's case.

Answer 6

Quite frankly, I don't know.

The only thing I can come up is radical, and that is to do what we did to get Japan's attention beginning on August 6, 1945. And that is to drop an H-bomb somewhere. It's like a hugh game of "Call My Bluff". It's crazyness run by crazy leaders who don't care about destruction of the world.

Answer 7

Bush should have been dealing with N. Korea for the past several years instead of screwing around over in Iraq.

Answer 8

Bush and the US should get over themselves. The US does not have any power over these countries and they just end up looking bad bluffing when they know there isn't a damn thing they can do.

Answer 9

not get roped in to one sided deliberations that way when it all hits the fan someone other than the US is responsible for a change (UN)