democrats naivity?

Question

Under the Clinton administration, Kim Jong Il received about a billion dollars, light water reactors, and plutonium. This was under a deal that Kim Jong Il broke. the democrats want America to lower itself by having one on one talks with NK instead of 6 party talks. why did more democrats blame Bush for NK's *supposed* nuclear test, than they blamed Jong Il? Sure, Bush didnt attack NK, but why was Clinton so naive that he made a deal with a lying communist? He lies to his own people, why not lie to a president? How much longer will democrats trust the enemy?? nice words and signatures on a paper treaty mean nothing.

Answer 1

I don't think you can blame any president for what a foreign country does or does not do. Nixon made a huge blunder with the USSR in the early 70s with the nuclear arms treaty. Fortunately, Reagan rectified the situation in the 80s.
The point is, no president can see into the future with a crystal ball. Any chosen policy can only prove a failure or success over time. If time proves a policy has not achieved its intended goal, then whoever is president at that time must correct it.
There is no point in pointing a finger of blame to any past president.

Answer 2

No. It's American naivety. The democrats do not have exclusivity when it comes to supporting a foreign government or leader who eventually becomes our enemy. Our track record is appalling. Do a little research and you'll discover that we've supported some of the most diabolical scoundrels on the planet, including Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. You can't lay this on the Dems, cause the Repubs have a worse record.

Answer 3

Here I have provided you some sources. This is a nice little article.
http://www.cnsnews.com/Pentagon/Archive/1998-2000/DEF20000417a.html

Answer 4

they allways believe if you dont defend your self you wont anger your attacker.......