2006-10-10 07:56:15 · 11 answers · asked by Super Duper Shiraz 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because they were such good times in contrast to today, that it's hard to watch someone criticize them. Especially someone who's blind to current events.
2006-10-10 07:58:51 · answer #1 · answered by Beardog 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
possible complicated question, undeniably straightforward answer.... They try this using fact a million/2 of us of a of america is lazy. mutually as individualism is stable, in my opinion, this is a disadvantage... human beings grow to be self-righteous and lazy. Policitcians can charm to that (which liberals have chosen to do) mutually as different politicians pick to charm to the different a million/2 of the rustic that hates the 1st a million/2 (which conservatives have chosen to do) Smoke and Mirrors, fool the a lot! EDIT: people who're asserting this argument has no benefit... evaluate the talk opinion over newborn hard artwork rules, extra time Pay, and prolonged Unemployment. mutually as some newborn hard artwork regulation is critical to circumvent abuse, some babies like the rewards for working. I worked on account that i replaced into 10 years previous, delivering papers and doing backyard artwork (lanscaping, not raking/mowing) This gave me and my relatives the money we necessary (we've been ALL working) to purchase a motor vehicle and pay for it outright in under 2 years. I had to artwork illegally using fact it wasn't criminal for me to artwork. extra time pay rules shrink the quantity of hours an worker is authorized to artwork. This forces employers to shrink hours and thusly limits the quantity of money an worker can artwork with out reaching 2 or extra jobs. prolonged unemployment is an exceedingly undesirable element. formerly human beings start up freaking out approximately strife and suffering only study on. This we could human beings stay for years on the yank teet. For no different reason than they misplaced their job. I even have met dozens of those that only shrink their residing expenditures so the unemployment examine covers all they want. they simply sit down decrease back and luxuriate in the unfastened holiday and then arent brought about to look for a sparkling job. purely over the previous 2-6 months do they even start to take it heavily. Then they are jobless with out unemployment examine. Liberal agendas breed lazy human beings. provide a guy a fish and he will eat for an afternoon, coach a guy to fish he will eat for a complete life, promise a guy a fish daily for not something and he will sit down on his *** all day and ***** that the fish tastes undesirable.
2016-10-19 03:53:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do Conservatives still praise Bush and cry when Liberals denounce him for his many failures?
2006-10-10 07:59:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Many of them have Clinton so far up on a pedistal and dont appreciate it when we make point of his failures..,just as many of us are aware of Bushes failures and we know he is not perfect but he has a spine to fight the terrorists and keep our country safe.Many of them take the acknowledgements of Clintons failures personally and thats where another problems lies.
2006-10-10 08:01:13 · answer #4 · answered by halfbright 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because Clinton was a GREAT president..and because even though he made some failures or mistakes or WHAT EVER George Bush is an idiot and they just want to prove how good clinton was!
2006-10-10 07:59:25 · answer #5 · answered by Abby 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
who? I don't know of this Clinton...
2006-10-10 08:07:25 · answer #6 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 way street,why do neo-cons cry when dems criticize bush?
2006-10-10 07:58:50 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Um because they want to.
2006-10-10 08:17:38 · answer #8 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because he was a great president.
2006-10-10 07:58:36 · answer #9 · answered by Willow 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because he's still their prettyboy.
2006-10-10 10:44:40 · answer #10 · answered by Souris 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋