English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

Because if they admit one failure then they have to admin another, and another, and another, and another, etc. It's easier to blame everything on Clinton as if he was the only person ever to be president prior to Dubya. They even blame NAFTA on Clinton when it was the administration of Bush 41 that negotiated it!

2006-10-10 07:37:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

That is the only thing they know how to do, blame it on someone else! Clinton left a surplus in the budget after 8 years, what will Bush leave after 8 years? One of the biggest deficits this country has ever known, but he & his rich friends will be riding high, you can bet on that!

2006-10-10 14:37:12 · answer #2 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 4 1

Incase you hadn't noticed everything involving government has about 10 years between cause and effect. The boom that started under Reagan, Clinton took the credit for. the things that Clinton didn't do we are paying for today. *LOL* That's the way things happen.

2006-10-10 15:26:56 · answer #3 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1 0

Because the self-serving Clinton did so many things that were harmful to the US and it took a while for them to surface.The path to 9-11 was just one example of that.If you take your blinders off,you would see this.I'll give you a couple more examples.
Selling nuclear secrets to the Chinese.And how about all the kids coming down with oral diseases because Clinton made it appear that oral sex wasn' really sex.Just because we are on the Clinton subject,how about all the ill-advised pardons he gave andhow about taking the oval office furniture as they left the White House.Want more????t

2006-10-10 14:48:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Well he did do a lot of stupid things that have put our country in harm and it takes a long time to unwind. Like the threats from Korea currently going on. He spent time trying to cater to Korea and get in bed with them. How stupid is that. Then they admitted that Korea "Fooled them". In Oct of 1994 Clinton stated that the threat of nuclear proliferation was over in Korea. He also let the threats from Iraq and Al-Quaeda grow with out ever addressing the apparent threats. He was foolish to think he can negotiate and enter contracts or treaties with countries that just want to kill us. Do you really think they are going to honor these agreements? We know for a fact they don't. Where has diplomacy gotten us in the last 50 years in Korea, where has it gotten us the last 70 years in Israel?

2006-10-10 14:47:28 · answer #5 · answered by scorpio 2 · 2 1

Because when dealing in politics 6 years is a blink. It takes time to restore damage caused by previous presidents. Clinton was not the great leader he was made up to be. It is true that we are still fixing his mistakes.

2006-10-10 14:43:55 · answer #6 · answered by only p 6 · 2 2

Here is the scoop, they blame everything on Clinton because they hear it on the Rush Limbaugh show. They are unable to think for themselves so the tune into Rush everyday to get their ideas. Rush himself is blaming everything on Clinton, with a splattering of some blame goes to Hillary in case she becomes president. They are just repeating what they have heard on his sick, drug addicted, show.

2006-10-10 14:38:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Don't think Bush himself blames jClinton. He was a big part of it along with his administration.

The Path to 9/11.

2006-10-10 14:40:46 · answer #8 · answered by Jean R 3 · 4 0

Just out of curiosity, since you named Bush, what exactly is he blaming on Clinton?

It's certainly not the excellent economy. It's not the low unemployment. He's not blaming Clinton for the record tax revenues despite a tax cut (proving supply side economics works, again).

So what is Bush blaming on Clinton? I don't think one example is asking too much.

2006-10-10 14:41:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Liberals do everything, didn't you know. If it weren't for Clinton sleeping with Monica, Hurricane Katrina would've never happened. That fool, why couldn't he be more like Bush?

Just kidding, of course.

2006-10-10 14:37:50 · answer #10 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers