English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

NO. I think this is the most dishonourable trade in human parts I have ever heard of. Of course, what is happening does not surprise me in the least. I remember reading an SF novel back in the 60s when Doctor Christian Barnard was performing the very first heart transplants; in the novel the story line was very similar to that which is happening in China today. Where money is involved, there will be more executions. The only human parts which should ever be made available for transplant from the dead, are from those people who have signed up, beforehand, to agree that their organs can be used for such operations. I disagree with any pressure being put on families of the dead to allow transplants, even where no will has been made.

2006-10-10 07:01:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I wouldn't. China's Communist governemnt is a murderer and has violated many human rights issues. They have killed many "criminals " for transplants just to fill their officials' pockets.
Btw, the liver transplants come mostly from Falun Gong practitioners persecuted in China.

2006-10-10 07:58:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

of direction, marrow used in human marrow transplants is from stay donors, and the withdrawn marrow would have some blood with it. subsequently, the Christian would would desire to be sure for himself no be counted if—to him—the bone-marrow graft would quantity to user-friendly flesh or would be unbled tissue. additionally, considering a marrow graft is a sort of transplant, the Scriptural factors of human organ transplants would desire to be seen. See “Questions From Readers” in our challenge of March 15, 1980. finally, writing in Harrison’s concepts of inner drugs (replace I, 1981, web page 138), Dr. D. E. Thomas observes that “very practically all marrow transplant recipients will require platelet transfusions” and a superb form of incorporate given “packed pink blood cells.” So the Christian would desire to evaluate what added subjects he would would desire to stand if he submitted to a marrow transplant.—Proverbs 22:3. in spite of the undeniable fact that a private determination should be made in this be counted, the Bible’s comments approximately blood and marrow would desire to help the guy to choose. Sorry for the shrink and paste

2016-12-16 05:22:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

If I needed a Liver Transplant that bad, I'd accept one from a Pig, if it was going to keep me alive!

2006-10-10 06:56:25 · answer #4 · answered by Kirk_84 4 · 2 1

I think if I were in that situation and the alternative was a slow painful death, I would take the transplant.

2006-10-10 06:56:22 · answer #5 · answered by horsegal 3 · 0 0

They don't use organs from humans...
They are famous for using
animal organs
for human transplants...

Did you know that they think by
eating animal penis's, humans
will have better sex lives?
Would Americans do this?

2006-10-10 06:58:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

over dying, I would take the transplant. Horrible as it is for the families concerned, they might take some solice in knowing that their innocent child/father/husband/brother is living on in somebody else.

2006-10-10 07:01:11 · answer #7 · answered by The one 4 · 0 0

to be honest i wouldnt question morality when a) its a matter of life or death and b) if they were executed they must have deserved it so their useless and destructive life can be turned into something productive even after their death

2006-10-10 06:57:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Hell yes, as long as they didn't have AIDS or hepatitis. And how do you know they weren't really criminals?

2006-10-10 11:03:32 · answer #9 · answered by Rotifer 5 · 0 0

of course I would if it's going to give me a couple more years of life

2006-10-10 07:00:19 · answer #10 · answered by carrox 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers