When will the marlins get an owner
i love the marlins
they have the best farm teams in the bigs
they give away every fricken player to other teams...this is why i hate the mets.
marlins would be a dynasty if they held onto mussina,delgado,dlee,pudge,sheffeild,livan,vlad(in AA),peirre....
theyve done a helll of a job this year, but, were would they be if they be if they held all of them?
2006-10-10 06:13:41 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
If they held onto all of the players you wanted to keep, then they wouldn't have much of the young talent they now have.
If they'd kept Delgado, then they'd be without Petit, who has a great arm for the future. If they'd kept Beckett, then they wouldn't have Ramirez and Sanchez. And if they didn't suffer some down years, then they wouldn't have made some of the good picks they've made.
And as for Mussina, why is he on your list? He was drafted and played for Baltimore, then went to the Yankees. He was never a Marlin.
2006-10-10 06:31:39 · answer #1 · answered by Craig S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the Marlins would be in debt if they kept all those players it is impossible to keep all the good players that have been on your team........I mean who would the Marlins be if they didnt buy a ring every 5 to 10 years and then completely tear the team apart the next year because they have to many high played players
2006-10-10 13:29:54 · answer #2 · answered by DEREK A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree with you 100%, I agree with you 1000%.
Don't forget they let Jim Leyland go as well. He went to the Rockies and that was such a bad situation that he ended up quitting after a year.
This team is the only undefeated team in Post Season History.
I hate to say it. They need to move to another city and start operating like a Big City team. It would be a shame for South Florida to lose the team, but hopefully it will let them operate as a top-flight franchise and compete with the best.
2006-10-10 14:47:59 · answer #3 · answered by L.A. Scene 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Marlins are ina bit of trouble. Other than just the manager position, there is even talk of moving the team. Now its just tlak but they have been looking at other states to move the team too that would be more profitable for them.
2006-10-10 13:25:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Marlins would have been better in the short term if they had kept the veterans. There's no doubt about that one. It will remain to be seen whether or not the young players they received in return will develop into stars.
2006-10-11 00:10:39 · answer #5 · answered by U.S. Soccer Fan 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They have an owner, just not a smart one. They do not have the best farm system. In the top 15, but not the best. They would not be a dynasty.
2006-10-10 13:48:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think they would've been great, and lets not forget that for a short period (8 days, I think), they had Mike Piazza well before his decline, and they gave him to the Mets.
: )
2006-10-13 22:51:51 · answer #7 · answered by rockiebattles411 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Probally in the playoffs...u forgot Penny too
Marlins need some help...
2006-10-10 13:16:48 · answer #8 · answered by modeledge 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Small market team. No money = no great players. It sucks, but it's the way it is.
2006-10-10 14:56:11 · answer #9 · answered by yblur 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i didnt know mussina was a fish
2006-10-10 13:31:02 · answer #10 · answered by 123321 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋