English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Hi ladies,how do you fell i should circumcise my son tight or loose,now i wiil want him to have a tight circumcision,like my hasband`s and with the frenulum removed.Now can you give me some advice abou the difrent methods and your personal experiences, Thank You

2006-10-10 06:05:53 · 18 answers · asked by diane 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting Newborn & Baby

18 answers

What kind of a cold blooded reptile are you b*tch? How can you justify making such a decision for him? How do you know that his future wife will want a man with a unfeeling dildo for a penis? Since you seem to think that it is up to a woman to decide on the fate of your son's manhood shouldn't that choice be made by his mate?

It is HIS penis not yours, it is not your decision to make. You may have a legal ability to make this decision but you know you would be upset if someone had ok'd body modifying elective surgery on you.

You want to give your son a tight circumcision. He will probably have tight feeling, uncomfortable to painful erections in his teen years (I knew this pain), when his penis should be attaining its maximum length. The tight skin will restrain the penis growth resulting in a shorter penis. Gradually the pain will subside as the skin stretches and the erectile tissues quit trying to get longer.

Another problem is that the lengthening penis will rob skin from the scrotum, resulting in hair on the shaft of the penis. This will not cause the male much of a problem but his female partner will feel like she is getting bottle brushed. But the damage will be done; there will not be a damn thing he can do to fix it then. What could they do, shorten his shaft to match the skin that’s left?

Complications occur at a rate of about one out of ten circumcisions, while most are said to be minor (I don’t know by who’s standards), some result in serious disfigurement or loss of function or even the total loss of the penis or life of the child. (CAN YOU IMAGINE DEALING WITH ANY OF THESE RESULTS OF AN UNNECESSARY ELECTIVE SURGERY?) These things happen in even major hospitals in this country!

Some doctors do use a local some still do not. The doctors don't think it is necessary because the little guys are easy to tie down and can't get up and leave or defend themselves anyway. Plus once the cutting begins the boy goes into shock and may even quit crying.

Does it really hurt the baby? If they give him a local that will wear off in a few hours, the pain isn't just during surgery it goes on for at least a week. Have you ever had a fingernail ripped off? The pain goes on and on for days.

Just because the boy can't tell you how bad it is doesn't mean that it is not painful. If you ignore a child's crying long enough they will quit crying, as it is not doing them any good anyway, nobody is making the hurt go away.

The thing is it is such an unneeded pain. The reasons that are used for circumcising are totally false.

If a doctor says circumcision is needed, it is because he/she doesn't know or want to know how to treat an intact penis. He can make more money cutting than he can by prescribing a cream to treat whatever little problem might arise.

More and more little boys are being left intact; those that are cut are going to see that they are missing something. Some day they will look it up and find just what was taken from them, without their consent. Do you want your son to ask, "Why did you have my penis cut? What gave you that right?

I see a lot of females answer these questions, like they have so much experience with what it is like to be circumcised. They have no idea! If her clothing was to grate against her clitoris every day all day, a woman might get the beginnings of an idea. They think it is just a flap of skin; with 240 feet of nerves and 20,000 specialized nerve endings the foreskin is comparable to the female clitoris.

It comes to this; some new mothers are so damn lazy they are willing to have their new baby cut on because somebody said it is easier than cleaning him or teaching him hygiene!

2006-10-12 12:16:46 · answer #1 · answered by cut50yearsago 6 · 4 4

1. No I wouldn't. 2. It's unnecessary and cruel. No proven medical benefits that make it worth doing. Also it's rare here in Australia, even though it used to be routine. It's fallen out of favour for a reason. 3. My boyfriend isn't circumcised and is very glad. He's never had any foreskin or hygiene problems either, they are not as common as pro-circumcision people pretend. Also some people here don't seem to understand how the foreskin works. It's really not a big dirty flap making everything smell. It's just a normal part of the penis. It can be easily cleaned. It takes days without washing for smegma to build up, and if a woman went that long without washing she would get smegma build up too. People say little boys don't clean, but on little boys the foreskin and the glans are attached, so there is no room for dirt or other gunk to "accumulate" like people say. But by the time a child is about 5 or 6 they've been taught to wipe their bottom, brush their teeth and hair, if you tell them to wash that area they will as well. Even if they get an infection, it's not the end of the world, antibiotic cream or tablets will make it go away within a couple of days. Harriet

2016-03-13 13:27:29 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 1

I think it's better to request that the Dr. perform a tight circumcision and leave some inner foreskin. I was circumcised this way and I think my inner foreskin (there is about an inch between the glans and the scar when soft) is even more sensitive than the glans. I don't know about the frenulum though since I was done as a baby. From looking at medical info on the net, I'm pretty sure I went home without that too. I am plenty sensitive as it is.and wouldn't want any skin hanging under my glans (That's what it looked like in a medical picture to me.)

2006-10-13 16:16:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I would just leave him alone if there is no medical reason to get it done. There can be too many problems with circumcisions.
And I could be wrong but I think removing the frenulum reduces a lot of the sex pleasure. I think that part is the most sensitive so you'd be wise to leave that part alone.
I don't have any personal experiences to tell you on which method is best because we did not circumsize our sons.

2006-10-13 11:55:41 · answer #4 · answered by PT C 2 · 0 1

Some things to consider. Do you know that removing the frenulum is like removing the clitoris? Whay do you want to give your son a BIRTH DEFECT? Have you done any research into this cruel and UNECESSARY cosmetic genital reduction surgery?

A tight circumcision also reduces penis length.

Circumcision is so last century anyway. If your husband had a leg missing would you cut off your son's so they would look alike?

2006-10-10 07:20:07 · answer #5 · answered by Terrible Threes 6 · 6 3

You want to remove his frenulum? The frenulum is the most sensitive part of the entire male body.
A tight circ could cause serious problems later in life.

I would add links, but all my links have been included by those above who are enlightened to the disturbing nature of circumcision.

No matter which "method" you choose, they all involve scraping the foresking away from the glans, stretching over a device, and slicing it off.
But please, for the sake of your child, don;t have him circumcized. If you absolutely feel that it is necessary to alter another persons penis, at least leave him his frenulum.

2006-10-13 12:09:03 · answer #6 · answered by FallingAngel 4 · 0 1

If your husband is circumcised why not? If you decide not to, your son would grow up wondering why his is different than daddy's. Talk to your husband about it and make the decision together.
When I had my son's done, I was not ever asked how...just did I want him circumcised or not.

2006-10-10 07:42:08 · answer #7 · answered by sonia 2 · 2 3

I also feel that circumcised is better. My husband is circumcised and I had my two sons circumcised. There is such a thing as a tight or loose circumcisions altho most parents are not given the choice unless they requset it. The ones performing the circs make the choice of how much skin to remove and so does the methods used. Usually the circ clamps used remove about 90% to 100% of the foreskin and result in a tight circumcision. There is another method where a plastic cap is tied on the foreskin and only removes about 30% to 40% of the foreskin and leaves the head about half covered.
One of my sons was done with this cap/ring and only the very tip of the meatus is showing. It looks like he almost isnt circumcised
My other son was just circumcised. His head is completely exposed and the line of excision is well behind the rim. He has a tight circumcision and it looks the best. I dont know about the frenulum thing or how it was done.

2006-10-10 09:05:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

hey, just to let you that the most sensitive part of the penis is under the head and the tighter the cut then the more of that skin you have removed, and the frenulum is similar to a woman's clitoris. Why not just respect him enough to leave him alone, like how he was born and then if he has a problem with being normal then he can cut himself when he's older. The peopel who are cut at birth have no problem with it cuz they don't know what they're missing. You can't remove healthy sexual tissue without removing healthy sexual tissue. Would you circumcise your daughter, then why your son. It's not true it's cleaner unless your son isn't hygenic just as if he didnt' brush his teeth or clean his ears he would have cavities and nasty earwax coming out of his ear. and if you like the way your partner looks cut why are you concerned about yoru baby, let him and his partner decide, if you think it looks gross it's only cause your accustomed to mutilated penis.

2006-10-10 09:38:53 · answer #9 · answered by Mat 4 · 5 2

We were never asked how we wanted it done,either, just if we wanted it done. But, I will say this if there being a tight version (I'm assuming more skin removed) and loose (less skin removed), I would go for more skin being removed. The excess skin can slide down over the head and the crease can become stuck togeather. This can cause the skin to try to grow back togeather and you have to keep pulling it apart, sometimes harder and farther than you think you should. It's more painfull for the baby to keep having to mess with his sensitive area after he's already been cut.

2006-10-10 08:14:24 · answer #10 · answered by barbieb73@sbcglobal.net 1 · 1 2

It's not really necessary to wash your car. It will run fine dirty, but washing it once in a while sure does help keep it cleaner and makes it look better.
I had my sons circumcised and it didn't seem to bother them at all. Almost everyone I know had their boys circed. My husband is circed, my nephews are all circed. Most males in the U.S. are circed. Every diaper I've ever seen changed revealed a circed weenie. I dont think is such a big deal. It's a very simple band aid
proceedure which has benefits for the male and female.
I prefer them done tight with no skin surrounding the head leaving it completely exposed. Looks better, cleaner and is maintenance free.

2006-10-11 02:59:45 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers