English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

or are they just brainwashed?

2006-10-10 05:59:40 · 13 answers · asked by Shiraz the truth detector 2 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

All of the above

2006-10-10 06:00:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Mostly just the leadership, the rest are usually brainwashed. Although I know a lot of liberals who are very hateful and intolerant.
And anyone who supports the racism of affirmative action is clearly a bigot.

2006-10-10 06:12:12 · answer #2 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 0 1

Why, no. It's the far right who are intolerant, hate-mongering, brainwashed bigots.

2006-10-10 09:27:26 · answer #3 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 1 0

You have it 180 degrees backwards. It is uptight anal retentive fear mongering right wing brainwashed holier-than-thou conservatives wrapping themselves up in our nation's flag under the spurious guise of patriotism that have the corner market on bigotry.

2006-10-10 06:07:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Just brainwashed.

2006-10-10 06:05:34 · answer #5 · answered by acmeraven 7 · 0 2

You have to have this Liberal boogeyman to distract you from the guilt about how your Nazi-Con house is full of fraud. Played with any page's peepee lately?

2006-10-10 06:12:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Those SOBs just stole another hat... and it was my favorite.

We have to stop the hatmongering liberals!.

We should stop their hatemongering as well. Their conquer and divide tactics of pointing our eveyone's minority affiliation with being PC, and then catering to them via entitlements which only serve to enslave and disempower the recipients.

2006-10-10 06:05:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Bush's signing statement: The president can order Justice Department officials to withhold any information from Congress if he decides it could impair national security or executive branch operations.

Dec. 30, 2005: US interrogators cannot torture prisoners or otherwise subject them to cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment.

Bush's signing statement: The president, as commander in chief, can waive the torture ban if he decides that harsh interrogation techniques will assist in preventing terrorist attacks.

Dec. 30: When requested, scientific information ''prepared by government researchers and scientists shall be transmitted [to Congress] uncensored and without delay."

Bush's signing statement: The president can tell researchers to withhold any information from Congress if he decides its disclosure could impair foreign relations, national security, or the workings of the executive branch.

Aug. 8: The Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its contractors may not fire or otherwise punish an employee whistle-blower who tells Congress about possible wrongdoing.

Bush's signing statement: The president or his appointees will determine whether employees of the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission can give information to Congress.

Dec. 23, 2004: Forbids US troops in Colombia from participating in any combat against rebels, except in cases of self-defense. Caps the number of US troops allowed in Colombia at 800.

Bush's signing statement: Only the president, as commander in chief, can place restrictions on the use of US armed forces, so the executive branch will construe the law ''as advisory in nature."

Dec. 17: The new national intelligence director shall recruit and train women and minorities to be spies, analysts, and translators in order to ensure diversity in the intelligence community.

Bush's signing statement: The executive branch shall construe the law in a manner consistent with a constitutional clause guaranteeing ''equal protection" for all. (In 2003, the Bush administration argued against race-conscious affirmative-action programs in a Supreme Court case. The court rejected Bush's view.)

Oct. 29: Defense Department personnel are prohibited from interfering with the ability of military lawyers to give independent legal advice to their commanders.

Bush's signing statement: All military attorneys are bound to follow legal conclusions reached by the administration's lawyers in the Justice Department and the Pentagon when giving advice to their commanders.

Aug. 5: The military cannot add to its files any illegally gathered intelligence, including information obtained about Americans in violation of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches.

Bush's signing statement: Only the president, as commander in chief, can tell the military whether or not it can use any specific piece of intelligence.

Nov. 6, 2003: US officials in Iraq cannot prevent an inspector general for the Coalition Provisional Authority from carrying out any investigation. The inspector general must tell Congress if officials refuse to cooperate with his inquiries.

Bush's signing statement: The inspector general ''shall refrain" from investigating anything involving sensitive plans, intelligence, national security, or anything already being investigated by the Pentagon. The inspector cannot tell Congress anything if the president decides that disclosing the information would impair foreign relations, national security, or executive branch operations.

Nov. 5, 2002: Creates an Institute of Education Sciences whose director may conduct and publish research ''without the approval of the secretary [of education] or any other office of the department."

Bush's signing statement: The president has the power to control the actions of all executive branch officials, so ''the director of the Institute of Education Sciences shall [be] subject to the supervision and direction of the secretary of education."

2006-10-10 06:01:47 · answer #8 · answered by dstr 6 · 1 3

No that is the religious nut cases.

2006-10-10 06:01:38 · answer #9 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 3 1

What was your first clue. What else have they got to do.

2006-10-10 06:05:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers