Are they good for America?
2006-10-10 05:42:10 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I hope people like they and their supporters don't breed at all... but seriously the fact that you even have to ask that question says it all... the whole purpose of the neo-con/fox news movement is to polarize us... to convince us all their is a gay arab man waiting outside our houses in the bushes to rape our children... fear is a powerful weapon..
2006-10-10 05:45:41 · answer #1 · answered by flawed broadcast 3 · 6⤊ 6⤋
I remember Bill saying that he would support the with draw from the war in Iraq a year and half ago if we did not see major progress .Well it has been long enough but I do not hear him changing his tune . Rush IS A LIBERAL who is making millions from conservatives and whoring around and using drugs .I would not consider him any kind of seperatist and his audiance is so dumb that anyone with half a brain could sway the oppinions of these morons .
Ann is no one to be taken serious ,she has made some money touting her books on these news shows who are all owned by a small group who spin all the news we get .
The real problem is we wonder around doing like we are told following the rules and living the lives that have been structured for the benefit of those at the top .
2006-10-10 05:57:04 · answer #2 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I find it curious that you only mention the conservative talk show hosta. Do they breed hate, probably. They spread inogorance and intolerance of other people's opinions. However, they are no worse than liberal talk show hosts and media personnel. They breed just as much ingorance and intolerance. To me, what we need is someone who will actually look at both sides of the story and make a judgement based on their beliefs, ideals, morals, and common sense. That is the man or woman that can lead this country back to where it should be. Your question is obviously slanted toward conservative talkshows (which is a misnomer in my opinion, I consider myself conservative but I can clearly see through Rush's hypocracy and Coulter's hatred) which in essence makes you just as guilty as they are of spreading intolerance.
2006-10-10 05:56:42 · answer #3 · answered by matt b 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
People such as these on both sides breed division and are most certainly not good for this nation. We will advance as a united nation or we will stagnate as a divided nation. Lincoln put it best with "a house divided against itself cannot stand". Of course there are going to be disagreements but that should just make us stronger as we work them out. This is not what is happening though. We have entered an area where those who disagree with an administration are declared bad citizens. Coulter is a perfect example of this. If people continue to place party loyalty over national well being we will go the way of super powers of the past.
2006-10-10 05:48:02 · answer #4 · answered by toff 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Do people Like Dan Rather, Katie Couric,Larry King, and all the Staff at Air America breed hate or agreement between political parties?
2006-10-10 05:54:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I guess you could say they do: liberals HATE all of the people you mentioned. Anyway, let's assume for the moment that liberals will succeed in defining what they do as "breeding hate". If Democrats get into office this November will they shut these people down based on that?
2006-10-10 07:50:49 · answer #6 · answered by Will 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They present the conservative side of the issues. Apperently this evokes hatred from the left. So what? Fear is the root of all hatred. As long as conservative writers and commentators are hated then their cause is being advanced. See ya @ the polls!
2006-10-10 06:42:08 · answer #7 · answered by caesar x 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here we go with another idea to ban freedom of speech right?Its amazing how airhead america went down the toilet but Limbaughand Hannity and the others keep gaining popularity and its because most americans dont agree with people calling our president a nazi and calling our troops terrorists.The far left has started the hate and we just arent going to take it anymore..,you want to cry when it comes right back at ya..,I do have some tissues for your issues tho.
2006-10-10 05:50:39 · answer #8 · answered by halfbright 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Whether you agree with them or not, there's no excuse for continually lying to their viewers like it was a simple body function. The thing that bothers me the most is they have no humility, cannot defend themselves, thier policies, their words WITHOUT attacking someone else. And they've past this traight onto so many right-wing bloggers. Just spin spin spin and nothing will stick to you, is their mantra!
2006-10-10 05:52:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Boiling this issue down to hate or agreement is seriously flawed. You've decided that it's one or the other. Without knowing you I cannot ascertain for sure where you stand or where it is you are coming from. It sure smells of a Liberal diatribe. Discussing the issues is always a good thing. And disagreement in the end does not mean hate. Get it? No, No, No, don't worry we'll wait a little for you to get it. The country will be in better shape if you and others "GET IT".
2006-10-10 05:50:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
They foster a conversation, and exchange of ideas. They have their postive sides.
O'Rielly shouldn't be lumped with the others because he is not nearly as extreme in his beliefs and he does frequently do what he claims to do, present a fair argument. Hannity less so. And Rush and Coulter are uber-conservative shills.
They are good for America because they don't spread hate, they share a particular viewpoint, just as liberal media outlets do. The difference is being able to separate out the spin from the reality.
2006-10-10 05:49:25 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋