All depends on the crime
2006-10-10 05:19:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Start with the definition of Moral Behaviour
Empathy and other forms of social awareness are important in the development of a moral sense. Morality embraces a person's beliefs about the appropriateness or goodness of what he does, thinks, or feels. During the last few months of the second year, children develop an appreciation of right and wrong; these representations are called moral standards. Children show a concern over dirty hands, torn clothes, and broken cups, suggesting that they appreciate that certain events violate adult standards. By age two most children display mild distress if they cannot meet standards of behaviour imposed by others. After age two they will playfully violate rules on acceptable behaviour in order to test the validity of that standard. One of the signs of the child's growing morality is the ability to control behaviour and the willingness to postpone immediate gratification of a desire.
(Encyclopedia Brittanica)
Then go on about the definition of crime.
After that, extrapolate a relationship between the two.
Good luck.
2006-10-10 05:22:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by QuiteNewHere 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
the respond to that question might seem obtrusive, yet in actual actuality it relies upon on why the crime became committed. case in point in case you scouse borrow something in simple terms on the grounds which you prefer it, than confident the crime is an immoral act. yet shall we are saying you have toddlers and that they are starving, so which you scouse borrow some bread, it remains a criminal offense in spite of if it on no account immoral. i think of to furnish an quite properly rounded presentation on the concern you should offer an occasion of comparable circumstances. good success to you. Jenny
2016-11-27 19:18:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by latia 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
An action can be illegal but morally right.
--example, helping a Jewish family to hide from the Nazis was against German law in 1939, but it would have been a morally admirable thing to have done.
An action can be legal but morally wrong.
--example, it may have been perfectly legal for the chairman of a profitable company to lay off 125 workers and use three-quarters of the money saved to boost his pay and that of the company's other top manager, but the morality of doing so is open to debate.
2006-10-10 05:26:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by What, what, what?? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is immoral and illegal. If you delibrately do something you know in your heart is wrong, that makes it immoral. That goes against all the morals you (should) have been raised with. One question to bring up in your debate, "How would you feel if this crime had happened to you, say by rape, hold-up, purse snatching, whaterever it be; how would you react and why?"
2006-10-10 05:39:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by pcsopunky 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Morality is relative. Was the man who shot the two people who raped and tortured his daughter in the wrong? Which is the greater crime, to kill a burglar who entered your house or to stand idly by why your lover is strangled? I think it depends on the motive behind the crime sometimes.
2006-10-10 05:26:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by FlyChicc420 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on the crime... For example, if you feel abortion is immoral, you would probably find it moral to stop someone from having an abortion.
2006-10-10 05:19:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chris C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
google search, type this
commiting a crime is immoral
2006-10-10 05:19:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, it shows the person breaking the law to be dishonest and untrustworthy. when they go to jail or prison, taxpayers pay for their care, which funds could be used to help people who do not break laws.
2006-10-10 05:20:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by phyllis_neel 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I suppose it depends on your morals.
2006-10-10 05:21:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by awakenspring 1
·
0⤊
0⤋