It appears the criminal bush administration has made yet ANOTHER bonehead judgement call, only now our West coast will be threatend by a nuclear N. Korea is less than 5 years, What's an idiot, manure chewing, treasonous president to do!?
http://www.nicholsoncartoons.com.au/cartoons/new/2005-09-20%20Kim%20Jong%20Il%20Bush%20blackmail%20226.jpg
2006-10-10 05:17:30 · 18 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
North Korea is more of a threat than Iraq. North Korea has stronger connections to terrorist activity, runs a more advanced biological, chemical and nuclear weapons program, targets American military bases and is developing missiles that could reach the lower 48 states. Most of us are lily-livered sunshine patriots who want an easy victory [over Iraq] but shrink from a difficult one and as a Bush Whacked nation we often chicken out of dangerous ventures to protect our egos.
2006-10-10 06:29:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He replaced into focussed on Monica, on account which you're dumb-a** cronies spent six cases the quantity of money to hound him as we spent on investigating the mess united statesof 9/11. using fact Republicans could not stand having a Democrat in place of work and that they have got been going to maintain digging till they'd carry him down (they even had FBI brokers working in this as a exchange of oun counter-terrorism) the finished us of a replaced into focussed on DNA stains as a exchange of threats to our us of a. using fact Republicans think of a bad genuine sources deal and a b.j. are threats to our us of a, we've been introduced to our knees. and because Bush does not understand foreign places coverage if it bit him in the keister, North Korea now could be a nuclear state. bear in recommendations who the president is stable now? it is your illiterate dip-s**t - not Clinton. And he's the only that allowed them to strengthen Nukes. Clinton's been out of place of work for 5 a million/2 years now. it is under Bush that the loopy chief with the lesbian haircut now has the international's maximum deadly toys to play with. You suck and so does your president for not recognizing what a real threat is and whose fault this is. Moron.
2016-10-19 03:39:49 · answer #2 · answered by haan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because N. Korea started their arms race before Bush was even president. Secondly, N. Korea has more allies than Iraq... we couldn't just barge in there without being in tension with Russia and China. And thus far, N. Korea hasnt done anything to us whereas the Al-Qaeda ( I didnt say Iraq) has.
2006-10-10 05:20:36 · answer #3 · answered by leikevy 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
You libs are funny. So now you want to start a war with N. Korea. How do you think that would pan out with China being the #2 world power and N. Korea's ally. Use your head bud.
2006-10-10 05:21:01 · answer #4 · answered by only p 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
If you want to fight a war and you have no real current Enemy. you must create one. North Korea is our creation. We will fight them and win, and then Exploit the cheap labor as we have done so many times in the past.
2006-10-10 05:21:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How is NK a threat to the US. There is no proof they have nukes, just the word of Kim Jong "Mentally" il.
If NK proves to be a threat to the US or even Japan they will disarm NK in about 2 hours. China and NK are no longer ideological cousins, for China it's all about the money. They have had a taste of capitalism and there is no going back. They do not want to endanger their rise to the top of the world's economic superpowers.
2006-10-10 05:23:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Current threat? How so? Other than insults, what have you to offer? What is your plan?
Give them more nuclear plants like Clinton did? Wine, dine and dance with the Troll like Albright did?. Did that stop their nuclear arms development? Uh, no.
And if you don't think Iran and Iraq are important, you haven't been paying attention.
2006-10-10 05:36:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
One project at a time. It makes things go more smoothly. With all the Democrats who urged Clinton to go to war with Saddam it surprises me that you'd have a problem with going there first.
2006-10-10 05:20:59 · answer #8 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps you can recall the 6 party talks that have been going on for years. You can hate the President if you chose, but not for this one. He's done exactly what he has needed to do.
2006-10-10 05:20:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
With the level of intelligence that you have with the name calling instead of just posting simple question,I dont think you could comprehend an intelligent answer.
2006-10-10 05:25:12 · answer #10 · answered by halfbright 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋