English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The “runaway bride,” who took off days before her lavish wedding in 2005, is suing her former fiance for $500,000, claiming he defrauded her out of her share of their assets, including a ladder, a gold sofa and gifts.
Jennifer Wilbanks is seeking $250,000 as her share of a home she says John C. Mason purchased through the partnership with proceeds from $500,000 received for selling their story to Regan Media in New York.
She also wants $250,000 in punitive damages for alleged abuse of the power of attorney she granted for Mason to handle their financial affairs.

He took her back for 1 year after she left him, then they broke up, she now wants the wedding gifts and half of everything even though she left him at the alter. Isn't he entitled to any profit made out of this as a way of compensation? What do you think?

2006-10-10 05:08:39 · 14 answers · asked by LondonLou 3 in News & Events Current Events

14 answers

Oh, sorry, I didn't see your question ... I just posted a similar question.

My first thought was that she just wanted to be in the limelight again.

As far as him selling the story, I think she probably should get part of it, or maybe try to sell her story on her own: maybe that is the problem ... NO ONE wants to buy her story so she is trying to get the money he made back when the story might have been some interest to the public.

The weren't married, so I don't think she is entitled to a house in his name.

As for gifts, those gifts SHOULD HAVE been returns a long time ago. Either that, or donated to charity.

If Mason has property belonging to Wilbanks' father, then that should be returned.

I, too, think she is a nut job.

2006-10-10 07:23:47 · answer #1 · answered by J.Z. 3 · 2 0

The divorce regulations are thoroughly set up so as that the burden interior the courting will constantly be a burden to the achiever. One companion makes maximum or all the money. They divorce, and the slacker gets to maintain a existence-type that they only had because of the achiever's confusing paintings. .

2016-10-16 01:08:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That woman is a first-class nut job and needs some serious help! I understand she wants half of her wedding gifts, too. Aren't those supposed to be returned?

She doesn't deserve anything. SHE called the wedding off.

2006-10-11 02:40:59 · answer #3 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0 0

Yes, he should get the money for putting up with that crazy woman. He was a little too compassionate for his own good in taking his fiancée back. She has hurt him enough, I think, and she should leave him alone.

2006-10-10 05:13:51 · answer #4 · answered by Edward 3 · 0 0

She's a brat! She should've GOTTEN sued for wasting people's time, including the police, and making race relations worse! Didn't they miss a fellow officer's funeral because they were out look for her?! Hope he countersues.

2006-10-10 05:23:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No she should not get anything, and who would want to read their story anyway? I wouldnt pay $1 to read it in the newspaper.

2006-10-10 05:18:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He should give her the money, sounds like just enough to get her crazy eyes fixed!! lol

2006-10-10 05:25:19 · answer #7 · answered by Jessiham 3 · 1 0

Someone said "people should get what they deserve and they should get it good and hard". Sounds right to me.

2006-10-10 05:12:09 · answer #8 · answered by doktordbel 5 · 0 0

All that woman deserves is Prozac.

2006-10-10 05:11:25 · answer #9 · answered by Buffy Summers 6 · 1 0

Personally, I think she needs to get a LIFE....

2006-10-10 05:16:02 · answer #10 · answered by BITE ME 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers