whether fundamental rights should always be recognize and govern in the manner the govt. wants ?

Answer 1

Too much abbreviation for a really valid answer. What you ask, I think, is incredibly serious. Fundamental rights end when anther's is jeopardized. The line between is not firm. That's why it is so hard to deal with.

Answer 2

this question doesn't really make sense, but it stands to reason that a governing body is only as effective as the people allow it, so the government should and usually does allow the fundemental freedoms to the people. With little regulation on a government level. I say this in terms of free speech, or finding happiness, which is a relative term. As long as you do no harm to yourself and others the government doesn't really care how you find happiness. Though this is an ideal version of our federal system in which the Christian right hasn't monopolized many offices. As such some I think they should always be allowed to the people.