most cameras over 3.1 million pixels with a zoom
cost is the factor here
the more you pay the better ,i like fiji
2006-10-10 03:04:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would recommend Canon or Nikon, for their quality in design, picture quality, many functions, and ease of use. The Nikon is more recommended for the less experienced or novice digital photographer, and the canon has many features that will appeal to a more experienced photographer, although both are simple to use for even the greenest of photographers. I own a Canon SD700IS and a Digital Rebel SLR, and I am very happy with both. Other cameras that can be considered are the Fuji. I feel the biggest drawback the the Fuji is the xD card, and the lack of devices compatible to the card. Otherwise, they have excellent quality, and function as well. The Olympus cameras also have great quality, but are not so user friendly, with difficult to navigate menus and functions. Sony and Kodak are hit and miss, they have a few cameras that are worth the venture, but as a whole, I would avoid them. Brands like Panasonic, HP, Samsung, and many many others, are definitely not worth the time nor investment.
Think about what features are most important to you, ie camera size, shutter speeds for action, image stabilizer, accessories available, and then narrow down what choices you have. If you have questions on any specific cameras, I'd be willing to give you my advice.
2006-10-10 03:20:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Olive Green Eyes 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Consumer Reports rates certain Sony Power Shot cameras very well. It depends on what you plan to do with the camera and what features matter the most to you. The best advice I can give is to call your local public library and find out if they get Consumer Reports because they did a very in-depth look at cameras, the different types, printers, etc. about three months ago. If they do have Consumer Reports available, or their 2006 Buyers Guide, you could go there and read the articles that they did and what their top rated cameras are in the many different categories that they separate all of the many different cameras into. I find their rating are extremely reliable and unbiased.
2006-10-10 03:26:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Susan & Greg C 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Think of your needws. here were mine, yours will be different.
They are very competitive as for price vs features.
If it is too bulky, you won't have it with you
nearly all have 3-1 optical zoom if you want to use the digital zoom you need at least 7m pixels, then you can crop with the computer.
for sending to friends and viewing you only need 1 mpixels
the display is nice but in low light and in crouds, you need a viewfinder instead, the smallest cameras don't have that
memory cards are no problem because you will have to buy a bigger one later
sony is good but you are paying for the name, cannon is great
if you are worried about theft or losing, the < $100 ones aren't bad
2006-10-10 03:19:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by jekin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have a vivitar for like 3 years and it seems to be a good camera my brother has a Kodak and it works well too.
2006-10-10 03:10:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
canon
2006-10-10 03:02:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by $P$ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋