Your reward is a nice tin foil hat:
http://www.ericisgreat.com/tinfoilhats/
2006-10-10 02:36:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No you didn't. Here is a SHORT LIST of the flaws in your argument.
1. Compares the Collapse of the World Trade Center to other notable high rise fires, but does not clarify differences in building design and size, structural damage and compromised fireproofing.
2. There is no exploration on the effect of fire on unprotected structural steel, which "loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F."[20]
3. Kevin Ryan the "expert" source from Underwriters Laboratories for steel certification is actually a non-expert from a subsidiary for water testing. Underwriters Laboratories does not certify structural steel, and ASTM E119 certification involves intact fireproofing as conducted by Underwriters Laboratories for the NIST in 2004.
4. Loose Change is especially skeptical with the lack of readily visible airplane debris and bodies in the Pentagon and Pennsylvania crashes. It uses other airline disasters as evidence there should be larger debris found. However, those crashes were accidents where pilots were trying to save their aircraft; rather than deliberately crashing them. A video of what happens to a fighter jet and its heavy engine when crashed into a concrete barrier can provide a more accurate comparison. Substantial amounts of debris and body parts were recovered from both crash sites as the recovery operations began.
5. While some of the calls from Flight 93 were made with Airfones, the documentary asserts that other calls made with cell phones could not have happened from cruising altitudes. However, in the recent book "Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts" by Popular Mechanics editors (ISBN 158816635X), they point out Flight 93's altitude was lower and it was frequently over rural areas with powerful cell towers. Commercial airlines are testing new cell phone systems since it's a cost effective replacement to the unpopular Airfone being phased out. Reception is also improved (cell calls were dropped on Flight 93), works over the ocean, decreases avionics interferance and flight crews can disable the phones.
Thats just the first five. But you liberal conspiracy theorists won't believe it, because it uses actual facts and science, and isn't presented in a simple form of a movie.
2006-10-10 02:41:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ricky T 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
You reward is that you never run into me...
You are still an ***...
Once again, I'll beat you like a little child and debunk you again...
http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/06-09-11.html
http://www.911myths.com/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loose_Change_%28video%29
Wikipedia – ‘Under History’ - "In August of 2006 a re-cut version of Loose Change 2nd Edition was released, which corrected many errors in the original release as well as removed some infringing material taken from the Naudet brothers documentary 9/11."
Wikipedia - Under ‘Corrections’ - "Korey Rowe, the producer of the "Second Edition", claimed in an interview, “We know there are errors in the documentary, and we’ve actually left them in there so that people discredit us and do the research for themselves"
2006-10-10 02:32:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by JerseyRick 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I just proved it too!...
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/911/Robert.htm
Let's SHARE our reward!
As for bringing these people to justice, that will NEVER happen as long as THIS secret and evil group's in control of everything!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
2006-10-10 08:32:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You award should be the National Stupidity Award for the Month.
Hey Raven (above) I like your answer!!
2006-10-10 03:44:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Caleb's Mom 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your reward is a nice padded cell and a wrap-around dinner jacket.
Enjoy...
.
2006-10-10 02:30:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
if you hate the US so much, why are you still here? Vote with your feet and take your buisness elsewhere. like Iceland.
2006-10-10 02:38:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by godoompah 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No reward, you failed to kill George W Bush
2006-10-10 02:31:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
A roll of bubble wrap.
Seriously, that stuff is fun.
2006-10-10 02:57:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by raven7night 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Put down the crackpipe, Francis...
2006-10-10 02:32:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by christopher s 5
·
0⤊
0⤋