What are some examples of limitations on liberty placed by the government which can be justified?
2006-10-09 21:10:39 · 9 answers · asked by scorn 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
none , no body is that responsible
2006-10-09 22:10:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Theoretically being endowed with rights by your creator is just a bunch of words. Realistically freedom and liberty are illusions of lifestyle, depending upon your ideology of lifestyle determines the level of freedom/liberty available to you, for example. Someone that choose's to live in a metropolitan area excepts the lowest experience of freedom/liberty having to adhere to not only city ordanace's, rules & regulations and state and federal laws, there are confinments of socail obligation as well. However one who chooses the lifestyle of a isolationist/survivalist enjoys the maximum freedom/liberty available, pretty much answering to no one but perhaps federal laws.
So the justifications seem to equate to how much you are dependent on the system/government to survive, or your quality of lifestyle your willing to accept, a trade-off it would seem.
2006-10-09 21:24:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As much as an individual wants that doesn't interfere with the liberty of others, doesn't cause pain or harm to others. Freedom to make a reasonable income, to live as one wants but not to create an offence to others.
2006-10-09 21:17:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A person is free to do as much as he pleases on the conditions that he doesn't harm another living thing, he doesn't commit any crime exercising his right to freedom and that he takes responsibilities in case his actions badly or negatively affect another human being.
2006-10-09 21:20:05 · answer #4 · answered by Equinox 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Almost none.Power of buying things & comfort does not illustrate the concept of liberty & freedom.
2006-10-09 21:14:01 · answer #5 · answered by saumitra s 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There shall be no limit to a person's freedoms as far as it does not harm any other person's rights.
2006-10-09 21:14:00 · answer #6 · answered by Pishisauraus 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Each person should have the freedom to do what they wish as long as it doesn't interfere with another person's freedom.
2006-10-09 21:16:25 · answer #7 · answered by starrynight1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
a legal term is you have freedom to swing your arms in any direction , but,your rights end where my nose begins
2006-10-09 21:38:57 · answer #8 · answered by jim ex marine offi, 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As much as you can.
2006-10-09 21:12:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋