English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

after all IF clinton's lie was impeachable offence, George W. Bush's is costing our boys lives!! & Clinton's was STRICTLY between him,his wife, & the intern,,,,,,,George W. Bush "THE TEFFLON APPOINTEE"

2006-10-09 19:18:21 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

18 answers

Not only should we impeach him! we should imprison him for crimes against humanity....
DOESN'T ANYONE FIND IT STRANGE THAT
40 MILLION WAS SPENT INVESTIGATING CLINTON....
BUT ONLY 600,000 WAS SPENT INVESTIGATING 9-11!!

2006-10-09 19:21:51 · answer #1 · answered by Sillira 3 · 2 5

well, we are a government for the people, by the people.

although washington sees it as government for the politcans, by the politicans. i mean, they give themselves raises, but wont raise minimum wage. its apparent who they care for.

Bush on the otherhand, 2000 was a mess, 2004, is an odd event, but what can ya do?

2000 Florida will forever be a scum in the Governments pocket, too many acusations and too many hear says. He was appointed by the supreme court, because re-election officals couldnt tell if the dot was on Gore or Bush, even tho, last time i checked, the dot is generally 0.5 inches big. we shoulda gave em microscopes or reading glasses if they couldnt tell.

But its water under the bridge now, i mean, 2004 has come and gone. and why impeach him? we can fix him on november 7, if Democrats take controll. I mean, with the new partisan politics, do you think Bush or any Democrat will settle for anything?

Absolutely not. the easiest way to rid of Bush, is to turn him into a sitting Duck in Congress and the Senate, because remember, the Supreme Court is now Republican-based. I doubt a Republican Supreme Court would rid of a Republican....So we'll have to change some officals in Washington, to controll what Bush does.

2006-10-09 19:42:19 · answer #2 · answered by hooked_ona_8SecondRide 2 · 1 1

Bush did win the election. Like every single president before him, Bush won the election of the electoral college. Ergo, you could argue that all presidents are appointed via the Electoral College.

Clinton's crime was perjury, and was proven. After all, he was disbarred. Clinton did great damage to the constitution simply because he should have refused to testify in the court case because of Executive Privilege. The President of the USA is an entire branch of government. He is immune to the acts o his subordinates (prosecutors in the executive branch) and to the judiciary (the courts) until such a time as he is either out of office or so ordered by an act of congress. Clinton damaged the power of the President and expanded the powers of congress and the judiciary.

Concerning Bush, would you not equally say that Clinton is culpable of the same lie, as Bush just repeated the same intelligence that Clinton used when he to said that Saddam had WMD's?

If you are talking about using the powers of impeachment and conviction for political axe grinding, then such axe grinding should be equally applied.

2006-10-09 19:29:38 · answer #3 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 4 2

Did somebody request verse? Is that the only qualification for poetry? possibly we could continuously be posting extra limericks. A definition of poetry: "writing that formulates a concentrated inventive information of adventure in language chosen and prepared to create a particular emotional reaction through meaning, sound, and rhythm" A definition of verse: "(a million): metrical language (2): metrical writing outstanding from poetry exceptionally via its decrease point of intensity" you comprehend i'm no longer a 'gusher', Ma. it incredibly is fairly not the final poem i've got ever considered, even nonetheless it provides imagery and makes a factor in a concise and poetic way. somebody may be taking the priority count in my view, in a sociopathic kind of way. There seems to be a virulent disease of thumb trolls as we talk. nicely, to no longer disappoint, right this is a few verse: "It places the lotion on its pores and skin otherwise it gets the hose back." --from 'Silence of the Lambs' .

2016-12-13 05:29:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it amazes me how many people still believe the hype of gwb he's been proven to be a liar and a coward didn't serve his time in the service but doesn't mind sending other peoples sons daughters etc to fight in his invasion of Iraq he could not catch Bin laden or maybe he was scared of his family or just in cahoots with them. funny his brother was gov of Fla both times and in Ohio our great secretary of state k Blackwell made sure he accidentally left in a warehouse many polling booths that just happened to to in minority and lower class neighborhoods where the turnout was great but the lines were hours long and some people couldn't stay due to kids, jobs, health. now Clinton did lie and that was not acceptable but I would choose him any day over GWB George wangle bullsh--

2006-10-09 19:44:16 · answer #5 · answered by katlady927 6 · 0 1

It seems you have your facts wrong. He won both elections, otherwise he would not be serving as president now. You make think that Bush is "costing our boys lives", but you would have a hard time making it stick in court since they signed up (volunteered).

2006-10-09 19:45:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Okay, you don't think he won the first election. What about the second election? Bill Clinton did more than lie, and cheat on his wife. Aside from all his wrong doings, he disgraced the office of the President (by lying under oath, and being immorale).

2006-10-09 19:24:56 · answer #7 · answered by Dano 3 · 3 2

I can't believe you still hold on to the first election!

Are you still angry at the kids who bullied you?

Clinton lied to a Grand Jury. And getting a BJ in the Oval Office is all Americans business!

2006-10-09 19:25:38 · answer #8 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 3 3

That is a very grown up question. Did you get that from the other fourth graders in your class? Ask your homeys who appointed him? Ask them if they liked having a president who commited perjury? Ask them when they will ever get tired of the kool aid and maybe start drinking water, it's much better for you and allows you to see clearly, like this is the best president we could possibly have for these times,

2006-10-09 19:24:47 · answer #9 · answered by Cinner 7 · 3 3

Did you miss recess today? Didn't we lose "boys" (as you call them) in Bosnia, Somalia, Serbia, and on the Cole? Or is it okay because we lost fewer "boys" there, or because we cut and ran like a bunch of cowardly dogs, and let Osama get the guts to do 911?

2006-10-09 19:35:08 · answer #10 · answered by mark g 6 · 3 2

Yes. before its to late.but he is the decider.he has control. not anyone else. he is our dictator while in office, answering to no one.I am so glad he really is not from the south. former C.S.A, I would be damn sorry if he was.

2006-10-09 19:48:11 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers