I think that the average person equates searching for the truth of what happened with "disrespecting" those that died.
I don't understand this- because the truth is the truth, right? And if you're after the truth, you're actually Respecting those that died more than just Forgetting about the whole incident.
What could be more disrespectful to those that died than just whitewashing the whole incident and never reexamining it and just assuming that what they tell us is true has to be true? What could be more disrespectful than attacking and maligning any person who dares to think on their own and think critically about the incident- and consequently shame all people from giving the incident a little more thought? What could be more disrespectful than that?
But then again, any person who believes that we should all just "shut up" about 9/11 and "leave it in peace" probably has never thought deeply about why 9/11 might have happened in the first place, and probably has not given a thought as to the causes (i mean deeper causes, not just "they hate us 'cause we're free" causes) of why it happened in the first place. These are the kinds of people who like to shame others into thinking a certain way- usually using psuedo-patriotism and religious-type shame and black-and-white reasoning to block people from thinking deeply about things.
So, do i think that the towers were planted with bombs? I just don't know. Maybe, maybe not. We'll never know because the "shamers" and "patriots" far outnumber the free thinkers and true patriots- and that includes the all-important people in the government who determine whether all of this even gets a passing thought or an inquiry or anything. We'll never know because this type of "patriotic" shaming is endemic among the citizens right up to the top of the government.
2006-10-09 19:21:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The biggest and least believable conspiracy theory is the one suggested by the government about 19 Arabs hijacking 4 planes, and knocking down two towers.
This is all complete codswallop.
It wasn't bombs planted in the towers, but specific explosives as used in a controlled demolition.
The same explosive was also used in WTC7, so there were three buildings destroyed in a similar manner. WTC7 wasn't struck by a plane, and had only very small fires. The Conmission report said they don't know why it fell down.
2006-10-10 00:03:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Planes hit, the towers fell, alot of good people died. Some people with no conscience made some serious money by making conspiracy movies. They are laughing while they rake in the millions. Yep the producers are rich. And they're not giving any to charity either, at least that I have heard about . So much for Moore helping the poor.
2006-10-09 19:45:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by mark g 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bombs have been tried in 1993 and FAILED - because of the fact the guidelines have been reliable sufficient to stand up to explosions. And secure practices on the WTC had bigger lots as a effect of the 1993 attack that it could have been impossible to get explosives in. for this reason the terrorists used super airliners packed with hundreds of gallons of jet gas quite. Tower 7 collapsed by way of structural injury brought about by the earthquake-like vibrations of the WTC homes collapsing and by debris scattered from the twin Towers. The conspiracy theorists base their arguments on fake concept - which includes airplanes drawing close to homes are immediately intercepted by the protection stress. that's no longer real. and whether an order have been given to intercept it could have taken time - the airplane could could take off from even if base they have been stationed at and fly to the section and then attempt to make touch and then call for instructions. the thought they could basically have fired a missile at any airplane that skipped over them is likewise incorrect because of the fact the ensuing explosion could have showered the city decrease than with debris and burning jet gas, and so forth. And the Rosie O'Donnell nonsense approximately warmth no longer affecting steel is basically that - nonsense. What does a blacksmith do to bend steel? Heats it to a severe warmth. additionally, as a techniques because of the fact the calls made on cellular telephones, some cellular telephones paintings at heights of as much as approximately 1500 ft (or extra) in specific aspects. (The WTC replaced into approx 1100 ft tall) their use on airplanes is forbidden because of the fact the indicators can (and do) intrude with pilot communications. The flight attendants who referred to as their dispatchers did so because of the fact they rightly assumed that something replaced into incorrect interior the cockpit and at that factor any interference replaced into probably the lesser of two evils. human beings did no longer suspect bombs because of the fact they witnessed the airplanes slamming into the homes.
2016-10-16 00:51:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by swett 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont believe in the towers planted with bombs but I do believe that the Pentagon was not hit by a plane,, Anyway there is something unclear about the whole issue...Very strange events ...
2006-10-09 20:12:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by kitty 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
You have to be joking! This isn't serious. Next someone in the Democratic party will tell you Bush, Cheney, Rove and Rumsfeld all had a meeting in the Trade Center Towers moments before they collapsed and were seen planting bombs.
Some people are soooo gullible. Think for yourself man!
2006-10-09 19:13:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
American administration understands that if you give the american people a full make believe spectacular show they will believe, Even GOD TV will tell you how faith is sold in the US,
Yitzak Rabin and George Bush, both presidents at the same time by sheer accident, both phsycos, both war criminals,
Both were the enemies of Islaam and muslims,
Death and destruction for them is not new.
Yitzak Rabin was the man who murdered 8,532 women and children refugees in the Shabra and chatilla Camps,
Bush you anyways know.
Now in any incident, what one sees is who stands to gain,
Osama bin laden gained by bombing or the US of A?
Thier Idea was to stage the most spectacular show for the US, and the western populations, use that as a handle to wage more war, Turn the world opinion against the muslims, Brand the muslims terrorists. and use the opportunity to 1. wage wars as and when they please, 2. to exercise more state control and take away civil libeties in the name of national security.
The American public is gullible, happy in the security of thier homes, and pubs and beaches, Dont care much about what the administration is doing cause they think they have seen it with thier own eyes.
Build the security hype and the public opinion and you can brand anybody and everybody unpatriotic, and if they speak out against the administration, mark them for treason.
so the truth tricles out cause there are people in the US who live by principles, who go by the truth, will wage any war against anybody just for the truth.
One by one things fall into place, The true patriots now start investigaging, the truth just trickes in, peices of the jigsaw puzzle slowly start to come in, the people who have seen cry horse, and fling dirt at those who investigage the truth.
This process will go on, for years, perhaps decades, You and I will be long gone, The truth shall prevail, and the world will know it as just another manipulation, No body will be brought to book.
bush and Rabin will be answering personally to GOD for every single death caused by them, and along with them will be those who helped them, and facilitated them, and those that could have found out the truth but chose not to.
The punishment from God would be severe, unimaginable, cause we are all after all the children of God. and God doent approve of one of his children killing a few thousand others.
Also ask any fool this,
will any man living in caves, without even cell phones for communications or any proper living, in hiding, sought by the world, in a war situation be capable of carrying out such a HI tech and Spectacular show, which will any way undo his entire plans,
OR
a man who commands the biggest force in the world, with the best resources at his disposal, whose authourity nobody questions, and who stands to gain in every way,
which of these two are capable of and have reason for carrying out such an attack on the twin towers.
2006-10-09 20:51:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It doesn’t matter what the public thinks. You can show them anything and they will believe it.
As far as the truth. This is the truth that there is no 2 towers any more so learn to leave with. lIke the say we love to die and American love to live
2006-10-09 19:04:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
no one knows the truth. We believe but do not know. Dylan Avery the film director started the ball rolling about planted bombs with his documentary Loosed Changes second edition. I recommend you watch it as well as follow the official version in the media, ask yourself questions and stick to your answers.
2006-10-09 19:23:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by fukallmonkeys 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
what conspiracy???????????
i SAW the planes hit those buildings that morning.... It was not bombs.... planes were used like missiles
It will be something that will stay in my memory forever....
Imagine seeing planes hit a skyscraper and what effect that might have....
Imagine what it feels like to know that there were people on the planes and in the buildings who were living 2 seconds ago that were just cremated....
Imagine the horror that people felt when they saw a plane come directly at the building as they took a sip of coffee before they got to business for the day...
Imagine the people inside who knew they couldn't get out in time....
And I didn't know anyone lost that day.... Imagine what it feels like for family members when they think of their loved ones final moments...
2006-10-09 19:15:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋