Clinton had a special adviser on Korean Diplomacy.
Bush immediately fired and removed that position, decided instead to "not talk to" Korea or Kim Joung Ill.
Korea now has 400% more nuclear weapons than it did under Clinton. And the topper.... Donald Rumsfeld was the head of the company that built and shipped him the Missles!!!!
Defend his policy please?
2006-10-09 17:53:36 · 18 answers · asked by GobleyGook 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Bush's daddy armed, trained, financed Bin Laden and the Taliban. Reagan and Bush also armed Iran. They also gave weapons to Saddam. And now we learn that Rumsfeld sold Nuclear reactors to N. Korea.
Ever get the feeling that the biggest threat to our nation security is the Bush administration? Screw terrorists, they got their start from both Bush's. what I want to know is who's going to protect us from Bush.
Learn how the Bush's and the Republican party created all our enemies from a Conservative link http://www.consortiumnews.com/Print/091701a.html
2006-10-09 18:01:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
We should have been more aggressive with Korea.
But this is your problem. Many people on Yahoo Answers actually are informed.
Why did you not tell us the whole story?
Clinton had Madeline Albright go over to N Korea and got that wacko to sign and agree to stopping their nukes in 1996, or so. We gave them Billions of dollars as an incentive to do so. In 98 Clinton was told that N Korea was defying their agreement and were making nukes. Instead of sending Albright back over there, he did nothing, because he didn't want any "headaches" to get in the way of his poll numbers.
So Bush inherited the problem, but what can we do now, bomb him?
So please study a little more or please be honest with us, it appears you have an agenda, but again, many of us know the score, honey!
2006-10-09 18:18:46 · answer #2 · answered by TG Special 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Lets say everything you said was true...
1) Bush has every right to fire anyone he chooses.
2) The USA does not negotiate with terrorist....this is why Bush does not negotiate with North Korea.
3) The USA doesn't know for sure how many nuclear weapons Korea has, its probably more, but Bush's policy has always been for them to stop. They would still have more even if a Democrat was still in office.
4) If Rumsfeld sold missiles then it was legal at the time. It would not have been allowed to take place otherwise.
You have no case. You just hate Bush. I urge you to study and think for yourself instead of regurgitating crap like this you heard third hand somewhere.
2006-10-09 18:12:59 · answer #3 · answered by T 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
nicely first I doubt that Bush in my view allowed him to do replaced into basically like whats up yah buddy pass forward attempt that nuke. The nuke finding out would be finished if 6 social gathering talks do no longer resume. it is something im extra fearful of no longer this stupid terrorist nonsense and conflict in iraq. yet there is no longer something to be won from doing something approximately Iraq different than the lives a pair hundred million individuals, I recommend its in comparison to they have oil or something that would earnings them.
2016-10-16 00:50:58 · answer #4 · answered by swett 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sources?
2006-10-09 18:21:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush let N. Korea get nukes? That is a good one.
According to many, he is responsible for quite a bit outside of what one would normally expect from mere mortals.
Unbelievable how this guy abdicates his "personal responsibility," eh?
2006-10-09 18:27:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Thats what I was wondering too, their so worried about weapons of mass destruction, they go into Iraq and turn their back on Korea.
2006-10-09 18:21:00 · answer #7 · answered by Robin W 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He can't some speach writer may spin some goobly goop!;-) but we know he can't, he's a dumb son of a president when it comes to not talking to other world leaders, even if one disagrees dialog leads to understanding and mutual respect.
It another fine mess he's gotton us into Stanley!
2006-10-10 08:51:13 · answer #8 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Clinton thing stole Americans money and bribed North Korea.... now North Korea expects the same tactics to earn the same rewards.... sorry commie bastards of North Korea.... you starve your people while you are fat pigs....
Now, if Rumsfeld really headed a company that sold missiles to an enemy, he should be in prison.... mmmmnh, wonder who gave our technology to communist RED china.... could that have been the clinton thing..... could be, could be....
Special advisors are useless.... NK thinks it will earn respect by having nukes... sorry commie bastards... taking care of your people will earn you some respect.... nukes don't.
Tell us, how anyone can talk to a communist.... clinton had to bribe the bastard... that isn't talking, that is succumbing.....
2006-10-09 18:01:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
WOW you know your facts, I bet you don't watch that much TV and that you read a lot.
Bush fans aren't that smart, most of what you will heard will be sound bites off Fox News. Some of these fools still think Iraq had something to do with 9/11, and that it is OK for a 50 year old man to harass little boys.
2006-10-09 17:59:00 · answer #10 · answered by tcmoosey 3 · 3⤊ 5⤋