Q. What is essential to analyze a thing?
A 1. You must see your self on the thing.
A 2. You must see the thing through your self.
Of A 1 & A 2, which one is correct?
2006-10-09 17:32:01 · 17 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
3
2006-10-11 23:38:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
2
2006-10-09 17:34:44 · answer #2 · answered by bamahotT 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You must see the thing through your self.
A. 2.
2006-10-09 19:21:59 · answer #3 · answered by Rose L 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question. In order to analyze a thing, you need to collect data about the thing first, so it has to do with the nature of the thing more than your position or understanding of the thing.
The thing comes before you, and not the other way around. So, your second answer is better: A2.
2006-10-09 18:30:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm starting to think you are a bit out there. You have perception beyond normal boundaries, but I must ask, what is your position? Your belief? Surely it revolves around the self, but is it mere semantics that have you tied up, or something more? Let it all out and you'll experience the bliss of God's love.
2006-10-09 18:18:13 · answer #5 · answered by Julian 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will take No. 1....simply because I must weigh my power of analyzing the thing with crystal clear manner....and whether I can stand before the thing to solve the riddle. (However, I am of opine that both are really tricky answers to a sane question.)
2006-10-09 20:25:37 · answer #6 · answered by indraraj22 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, a person who has the capability to enhance his perception levels beyond sense organs, would find it very easy to BECOME that thing, and he easily can analyze / understand EVERYTHING that can be known about it. The nearest word in English to this process is "synthesis".
2006-10-09 18:08:47 · answer #7 · answered by Spiritualseeker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A2
If you see your self on the thing, your analysis will suffer due to lack of objectivity.
Analysis calls for deeper looking, hence seeing through is necessary.
2006-10-09 17:54:24 · answer #8 · answered by small 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both.
Cause if you compare and analyze two things or more you'll have a better result than if you only analyze one thing.
more data to analyze is the better the result.
2006-10-09 21:33:10 · answer #9 · answered by Joxie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A2 as life is experience through the self. The meaning of what we observe is unique to each person as our lives are made of experiences that are personal to our life experiences and history's.
2006-10-09 19:07:52 · answer #10 · answered by alfred jarry jnr 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋