Lol, most definately not. Oh, and they pull all the stops. We were talking in one of my classes...is it possible that this whole gasoline up-down price thing is a conspiracy. How ironic is it that the gas prices dipped lower, by about 10-15 cents/gallon, just before fall elections. The republicans are on slippery ground...and Bush isn't doing much of anything to help them.
We have to come back and readdress this. If, after elections, the gas prices go back up...it WAS a conspiracy after all.
2006-10-09 17:11:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by lilsedalemami 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
they are going to proceed triumphing state and native elections. that's substantial to remember that the "Hispanic vote" is rather legendary. First (and to a lesser quantity 2d) technology Cuban-individuals have distinctive goals than youthful Cuban-individuals. And Marco Rubio, who's in all probability to be the two No. a million or 2 on the 2016 Republican value ticket is one in all their very own. Chris Christie additionally has somewhat some potential between Cuban-individuals. Mexican-individuals have distinctive pursuits and goals than Cuban-individuals. Puerto Ricans are yet yet another activity team with their very own goals and values. the comparable would desire to be suggested of alternative Hispanci sub-communities. previous that, you will detect liberals, moderates, and conservatives between each ethnic team. some all of us is workers, on a similar time as others are small business enterprise proprietors, and a few are experts. some are previous and a few are youthful. There are Roman Catholics, Protestants, atheists, agnostics, and members of no faith or different religions. some are members of the LGBT community. there's a protracted record of etcs. Mainstream Republicans are changing their perspectives on immigration. The hardliners misplaced huge for the period of the known season, and Romney's anti-immigration stance became a factor in his loss. No, the Republican get jointly can not win the presidency with out being extra open to the rights and asperations of immigrants and undocumented workers.
2016-12-26 14:45:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question should be Can a Democrat ever get back into office without the Republicans rigging the elections? To answer your question though, I believe that yes they can- they have been elected in the past before all this nonsense started with the election problems of today. Let me add I hope they never get in office again-8 years of a "president" who was not elected either time is ENOUGH!!!!!!
2006-10-09 17:07:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by PROUDJEW 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well either the Republicans are clever and the Democrats are idiots (that's a given by the way) or the American voters know a good President when they elect him.
Want an excellent example?
Ronald Reagan was elected to his first term beating Jimmy Carter. Reagan received 489 electoral votes to Carter's 49. That's not a typo, Mr. Carter only got 49 out of 538 electoral votes.
Do the math...he only got 9.1% of the electoral votes.
President Reagan won his second term by an even bigger electoral vote landslide. Reagan received 525 electoral vote to Senator Mondale's ...wait for it... 13 electoral votes. Again, that's not a typo...Mondale only received 13 votes which equates to a mere 2.4% of the electoral votes.
Pretty tough to rig an election where you win each election by over 90% o the votes.....
Oh, and if you are wondering about the popular vote count....
Ist election Reagan 59% (44 states)
Carter 41% (6 states)
2nd election Reagan 60% (49 states)
Mondale 40% (1 state)
2006-10-09 17:27:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by iraq51 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
You might check your facts. The only convictions for "rigging" elections were accomplished by Democrats. Now that could just mean that Republicans are smarter than Democrats. It is more likely that Democrats are just so conceited that they think that they couldn't loss unless the election was rigged. I heard the reason that Al Gore was so sure that they had won in Florida was because he knew that they had cheated and he could not accept that Bush still won.
2006-10-09 17:09:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
You say republicans are stupid for going to war in Iraq, but then give them credit for being smart enough to rig a national election? You are kind of messed up, dude. So which is it?
I doubt it, dumbass
2006-10-09 17:11:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by dlobryan1 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
They always have got in office without rigging elections. Far different then the Democrats, with their duel registering, registering dead people and don't forget the Tammany Hall Corruption.
2006-10-09 17:06:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by timberland1952 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
How would there be anything but Republican presidents, if they are rigging the elections?
2006-10-09 17:04:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chris J 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
That's a good question for George w Bush next runner up.i think it would make a good debate.
2006-10-09 17:05:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by joe 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, it's in the standard operation procedures (SOP) manual each Republican is handed when they join the party.
2006-10-09 18:23:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋