somewhere i feel that boolean logic should or will have to had been involved...future causality must define the ideal even if the present definition is indeterminable????????
2006-10-09 16:17:24 · 10 answers · asked by mark b 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
It is all a question of measurement. If you accept that the answer to "How long is a piece of string? The answer is "Twice half its length" then by extrapolation you should eventually be able to arrive at the ideal length.
2006-10-10 01:51:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Murphy's Law
2006-10-09 23:24:45 · answer #2 · answered by schaianne 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is the same reason that my checking account always has less money in it than I want it to have.
2006-10-09 23:22:07 · answer #3 · answered by Kokopelli 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sods law
Nothing is ever perfect when we require it to be.
This is a human condition - in pursuit of our own perfection almost everything falls short of our ideals.
lol x
2006-10-09 23:22:08 · answer #4 · answered by trebs 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe you can try measuring it carefully before cutting it to avoid getting into this situation...If it still keeps happening, please feel free to ask the same question again, then we'll see what we can do for that.
2006-10-09 23:35:49 · answer #5 · answered by ono 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Exactly how long is a piece of string anyway?
2006-10-09 23:21:47 · answer #6 · answered by Lorraine R 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
just get more than you need. that way you will always have enough.
Just look at all the billionaires in the world - they have more than enough therefore they always have enough.
2006-10-10 00:04:04 · answer #7 · answered by master_betty_101 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
G string?
2006-10-09 23:56:23 · answer #8 · answered by Henry W 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's the way the cookie crumbles.!!!
2006-10-09 23:45:44 · answer #9 · answered by JAM123 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ah, my child...
Measure twice...
cut once....
2006-10-09 23:24:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋