The Islamic fundamentalist feel they are freedom fighters and they may very well be. We have no business telling them how to run their country's or what kind of government to have. George Bush is an aggressor and should be locked up for his crimes against humanity
2006-10-09 15:55:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
If Al Quaida ever had a good recruiter, Mr. Bush beat them all. His policies managed to not only recruit but unite a lot of the Middle Eastern countries against the U.S. Nice going Mr. Bush....
2006-10-09 23:02:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
He has simplified which Western government to blame. Bush is very easy to understand, his military brilliance is consistently predictable as he simply 'stays the course' Bush has generously allowed previously underemployed global terrorists to fully focus their attention & hate filled expertise in the World Games now in Iraq. These Olympian terrorists have brought the competative global terrorists out of retirement to help train a new batch of high tech trainnees. Way ta Go George!!!
2006-10-09 23:07:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
It is a mess isn't it?
Why was there such a rush to go in to a already contained area?
What were the stated goals then, and why are they always open-ended?
As Galloway advised us in somber testimony to the U.S. Senate:
"Have a look at the real Oil-for-Food scandal. Have a look at the 14 months you were in charge of Baghdad, the first 14 months when $8.8 billion of Iraq's wealth went missing on your watch. Have a look at Halliburton and other American corporations that stole not only Iraq's money, but the money of the American taxpayer.
"Have a look at the oil that you didn't even meter, that you were shipping out of the country and selling, the proceeds of which went who knows where? Have a look at the $800 million you gave to American military commanders to hand out around the country without even counting it or weighing it.
"Have a look at the real scandal breaking in the newspapers today, revealed in the earlier testimony in this committee. That the biggest sanctions busters were not me or Russian politicians or French politicians. The real sanctions busters were your own companies with the connivance of your own Government."
2006-10-09 22:55:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by dstr 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
You commislamic fascists have got it @ss backwards. The best recruiters the terrorists ever had is YOU. Each time an American has negative things to say about the Bush administration, it encourages our enemies.A lie travels around the world while truth is putting her boots on. That, believe it or not, is a FRENCH proverb.
2006-10-09 23:19:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Because he opened a hornet's nest, i.e Iraq. Then he put the US military there as bait, a terrorists dream, to have Americans on their holy soil, providing a justification to Al Quaida, to assemble in the region.
2006-10-09 23:00:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by meldorhan 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
My God, how have both political parties been able to train so many PARROTS. Talk, talk, talk the same same; no think, think, think for themselves.
Do you believe this?(**) Is any one person ALWAYS wrong or right?
Is any one political party ALWAYS right or wrong.
Think of your to response to people and parties; do you acknowledge (trying to be impartial) strength and weaknesses??
IF NOT, YOU ARE A PARROT, squawk, squawk.
**
YOU in this case is not directed to the author of the question, but you in the general (plural) sense.
2006-10-09 23:01:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I thought all the democrat politicians who call soldiers nazis and thugs, and throat cutting terrorists they call "freedom fighters", i thought they were the best recruiters of terrorists.
aside from the obvious hatefilled mullah or imam.
2006-10-09 22:59:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Because the Al-Qaeda is getting whipped out and radical muslims are anxious to get to their "72 virgins"?
2006-10-09 23:10:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by bennyjoe81 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
To fight a war he needs an ennemy and if the ennemy is not there he should recruit them ..
2006-10-09 22:57:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by kitty 2
·
2⤊
1⤋