2006-10-09 15:48:14 · 17 answers · asked by Phil S 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
of course they wont. They're loyal to people rather than to ideas. This is why their propaganda is so hypocritical and transparent.
2006-10-09 15:58:33 · answer #1 · answered by LR C 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
How did he ignore North Korea for five years, are you saying he was negligent in not restarting the Korean War? I'm not necessarily a Bush fan, but when it came to North Korea he encouraged multilateral diplomacy through the Six Party Talks. Isn't multilateral dimplomacy "a good thing" according to liberals, or has that been revised?
If he had of engaged North Korea bilaterally he would of alienated Russia, China, Japan and the ROK, who are the ones that are actually stuck with the PDRK for a neighbor. Bush can be faulted for lots of things, but he has maintained reasonably good PRC-USA relations, which is the key to this problem.
2006-10-10 01:31:32 · answer #2 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Again with the Clinton Blame Game.
Donald Rumsfeld served on the Board of Directors for ABB, a company that netted a $200 million contract when it won a deal to supply North Korea with two nuclear power plants.
Your Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, made money by providing nuclear technology to North Korea.
2006-10-09 23:01:43 · answer #3 · answered by spire2000 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
About the only thing that Bush ignored was the fact that North Korea did not want to have talks with the other nations involved, they wanted to have talks with the United States only and no one else. Bush did not want to and still does not want to give in to their demand of a one on one talk.
2006-10-09 22:53:52 · answer #4 · answered by ♥Me-Just Me♥ 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
That would almost be funny if it wasn't for the severity involved .
Go back to 1994 when Bill Clinton started the process that got Kim Jong ll his materials to make nukes . Just because Hillary Clinton sounded off today , trying to throw off the scent ( as usual )-saying President Bush should adopt a more effective policy...doesn't mean we don't know what she & her husband did to harm our National Security .Bill & Hillary learned their street fighting tactics from Hillary's radical prophet , Saul Alinsky . Thank the Clintons .Give credit where credit is due . "W" has been successful keeping the terrorists on the run -slowly but surely , he's still cleaning up after the The Clinton mob .
2006-10-09 23:02:47 · answer #5 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Now let me get this straight. Because talks and diplomatic bartering failed, you say Bush ignored North Korea? Are you truly a Commislamic Fascist? The last time I noticed, most of your ilk were saying Bush should have talked more before going into Iraq.
2006-10-09 23:23:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes, I admit we f*cked up tremendously by voting for that knuckleheaded nincompoop. But he promised that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq even though he knew that North Korea was talking about nuclear weapons at the same time. What knuckleheads we Republicans were at the time.....
2006-10-09 22:56:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
What is he supposed to do? There are 6 party talks with all the countries that currently have nukes so the blame lies on all of them. And the U.N. hardly did anything to prevent this. Why are people always connecting things to Bush? We knew this was happening and we tried to stop it.
2006-10-09 22:50:33 · answer #8 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Clinton sure helped the process by giving N Korea brand new reactors..
2006-10-09 22:50:57 · answer #9 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
He's the one who caused this. Remember his "axis of evil"? Then we attacked Iraq. Now Iran and N Korea is building weapons thinking we will attack them next. IT IS HIS FAULT...
2006-10-09 22:59:03 · answer #10 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Willing to say that Clinton SCREWED up for giving them the technology that led to this day?
2006-10-09 22:51:50 · answer #11 · answered by jirwin7211 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋